A liability for the climate impact of foods for financing negative emissions

Meeting the Paris Agreement's temperature objective requires the removal of significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the atmosphere, highlighting the urgent need for financing negative emission technologies. Given the difficulties in mitigating agricultural emissions, this paper proposes a “food climate liability fee.” The fee is based on the climate impact of food combined with an estimated cost-level of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and the generated income is earmarked for funding CO 2 removals. We explore the effects of implementing this fee using Sweden as an example, analyzing scenarios ranging from including all food-related emissions to a fee specifically on the harder-to-mitigate methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from high-impact animal-based foods. Targeting all emissions could generate sufficient financing for removals to balance emissions from Swedish food consumption. A more focused fee on high-impact foods could cover 85% of CH 4 and N 2 O food-related emissions, of relevance if CO 2 emissions are addressed through other means.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on climate change.
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768659261449305
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A liability for the climate impact of foods for financing negative emissions

Emma Moberg, Anders Lyngfelt, Mathias Fridahl
Dialogues on climate change.
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

A liability for the climate impact of foods for financing negative emissions

Emma Moberg, Anders Lyngfelt, Mathias Fridahl
article en

Abstract

Meeting the Paris Agreement's temperature objective requires the removal of significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the atmosphere, highlighting the urgent need for financing negative emission technologies. Given the difficulties in mitigating agricultural emissions, this paper proposes a “food climate liability fee.” The fee is based on the climate impact of food combined with an estimated cost-level of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, and the generated income is earmarked for funding CO 2 removals. We explore the effects of implementing this fee using Sweden as an example, analyzing scenarios ranging from including all food-related emissions to a fee specifically on the harder-to-mitigate methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) from high-impact animal-based foods. Targeting all emissions could generate sufficient financing for removals to balance emissions from Swedish food consumption. A more focused fee on high-impact foods could cover 85% of CH 4 and N 2 O food-related emissions, of relevance if CO 2 emissions are addressed through other means.

Dialogues on climate change.
Linköping University (SE), IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (CN), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.