The digitalization of urban forest management

New and advancing digital tools not only change how urban forest data is generated, stored, analyzed, and visualized, these tools also reshape the meaning and management of urban forests. To understand how, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 63 urban forestry practitioners in 21 cities across four U.S. states. We analyzed the types and applications of digital tools used in urban forestry management and the ways in which managers use digital tools to address challenges in their daily work. Our findings show that digital tools play a significant role in the co-production of urban forests by directly and indirectly affecting the value of trees as city assets, which also gives trees more equitable standing among other non-human urban structures. Digital tools are widely used in both small and large cities to inventory and assess urban forests, but large cities have greater access to digital tools and capacity to employ them to more diverse ends. As a result, digital tools reinforce disparities that favor well-funded programs over smaller, technologically marginalized programs. In conclusion, this paper offers an empirically grounded account of how digitalization informs the management and interpretation of urban forests within broader smart city and digital governance contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Geography and Society
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2026.100175
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The digitalization of urban forest management

Ashley R. Coles, Matthew Fry, Yekang Ko, Alexandra G. Ponette-González
Digital Geography and Society
Urban Green Space and Health
article

The digitalization of urban forest management

Ashley R. Coles, Matthew Fry, Yekang Ko, Alexandra G. Ponette-González
article en

Abstract

New and advancing digital tools not only change how urban forest data is generated, stored, analyzed, and visualized, these tools also reshape the meaning and management of urban forests. To understand how, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 63 urban forestry practitioners in 21 cities across four U.S. states. We analyzed the types and applications of digital tools used in urban forestry management and the ways in which managers use digital tools to address challenges in their daily work. Our findings show that digital tools play a significant role in the co-production of urban forests by directly and indirectly affecting the value of trees as city assets, which also gives trees more equitable standing among other non-human urban structures. Digital tools are widely used in both small and large cities to inventory and assess urban forests, but large cities have greater access to digital tools and capacity to employ them to more diverse ends. As a result, digital tools reinforce disparities that favor well-funded programs over smaller, technologically marginalized programs. In conclusion, this paper offers an empirically grounded account of how digitalization informs the management and interpretation of urban forests within broader smart city and digital governance contexts.

Digital Geography and Society
Texas Christian University (US), University of Oregon (US), University of Utah (US), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Natural History Museum of Utah (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.