A novel digital intervention to support mental and sexual wellbeing after stroke and brain injury: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

<b>Objective</b>: To assess the feasibility of a novel digital self-management intervention (HOPE4ABI) supporting mental and sexual wellbeing for stroke and acquired brain injury survivors<br/><b>Design</b>: Parallel, 1:1 allocation, feasibility randomised controlled trial with two arms.<br/><b>Setting</b>: Online.<br/><b>Participants</b>: UK-based adults (n=53) living with any type of acquired brain injury, sustained at least 3 months prior to trial entry.<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Participants were randomly assigned to either the self-guided (n=26) or group-facilitated (n=27) 8-week online intervention. All participants received identical information and intervention content, but peer-to-peer interactions and facilitation were only available in the group-facilitated arm.<br/><b>Outcome measures</b>: Primary outcomes were rates of recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability, measured against a priori criteria. Secondary outcomes were scores on measures of mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing and quality of life, recorded at baseline, 8-weeks, and 6-months. <br/><b>Results</b>: The recruitment rate relative to the target was acceptable (n=53 recruited / n=60 target; 88.3%). At 6-months, questionnaire data were available for n=45 (84.9%) thus meeting the progression criteria. Neither the engagement criteria (52.3%, n=23/44), nor acceptability criteria (75.7%, n=28/37) were met. The 6-month follow-up data showed improvements in mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing, and quality of life relative to baseline.<br/><b>Conclusions</b>: On balance, a definitive RCT is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes of recruitment and retention rate met the progression criteria, and engagement and acceptability issues were addressed through participant feedback. There were signals of efficacy noted across all outcome measures at 6-month follow up.<br/>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pure (Coventry University)
Published
2026-04-21
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel digital intervention to support mental and sexual wellbeing after stroke and brain injury: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Aimée Walker-Clarke, Hayley Wright, David McWilliams, Andy; id_orcid 0000-0001-6538-4242 Turner
Pure (Coventry University)
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

A novel digital intervention to support mental and sexual wellbeing after stroke and brain injury: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Aimée Walker-Clarke, Hayley Wright, David McWilliams, Andy; id_orcid 0000-0001-6538-4242 Turner
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To assess the feasibility of a novel digital self-management intervention (HOPE4ABI) supporting mental and sexual wellbeing for stroke and acquired brain injury survivors<br/><b>Design</b>: Parallel, 1:1 allocation, feasibility randomised controlled trial with two arms.<br/><b>Setting</b>: Online.<br/><b>Participants</b>: UK-based adults (n=53) living with any type of acquired brain injury, sustained at least 3 months prior to trial entry.<br/><b>Intervention</b>: Participants were randomly assigned to either the self-guided (n=26) or group-facilitated (n=27) 8-week online intervention. All participants received identical information and intervention content, but peer-to-peer interactions and facilitation were only available in the group-facilitated arm.<br/><b>Outcome measures</b>: Primary outcomes were rates of recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability, measured against a priori criteria. Secondary outcomes were scores on measures of mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing and quality of life, recorded at baseline, 8-weeks, and 6-months. <br/><b>Results</b>: The recruitment rate relative to the target was acceptable (n=53 recruited / n=60 target; 88.3%). At 6-months, questionnaire data were available for n=45 (84.9%) thus meeting the progression criteria. Neither the engagement criteria (52.3%, n=23/44), nor acceptability criteria (75.7%, n=28/37) were met. The 6-month follow-up data showed improvements in mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing, and quality of life relative to baseline.<br/><b>Conclusions</b>: On balance, a definitive RCT is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes of recruitment and retention rate met the progression criteria, and engagement and acceptability issues were addressed through participant feedback. There were signals of efficacy noted across all outcome measures at 6-month follow up.<br/>

Pure (Coventry University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.