The perceptions of maternity care-seeking and care-giving experiences during a health-system shock:A qualitative study with healthcare professionals and policy makers in the UK with a focus on care for marginalised groups

Background: Healthcare-providers [HCPs] and policymakers had to re-organise and adapt to maternity services rapidly during the pandemic, and as a result, women’s care-seeking and experience within maternity services were affected. <br/><br/>Aims: This study aims to explore HCPs’ and policymakers’ perspectives of maternity care-seeking and experiences, with a particular focus on marginalised groups. We take a future-focused approach to informing policy, to re-build UK maternity services which remain beleaguered. <br/><br/>Method: Semi-structed in-depth interviews were undertaken with 21 HCPs and 20 policymakers across the four nations of the UK, to discuss their perception of maternity care-seeking and experiences during the pandemic. Data were analysed using Template Analysis, based on an extended version of the Candidacy framework. <br/><br/>Results: HCPs struggled to navigate reconfiguration of services and implement changes. It was challenging to strike a balance between the need to protect women from the virus, whilst maintaining high quality care. The transition to virtual care hindered HCPs ability to identify patients’ claim to candidacy, affecting the ability to deliver safe and high-quality care. The standardisation of self-monitoring and virtual care, although beneficial for some, adversely affected those with medical and social complexity. Policy had failed to address inequalities prior to service reconfiguration, making it harder for HCPs to engage with marginalised groups. This included service users with social complexity: lack of social support, mental health problems, or belonging to a minority group relating to sexual orientation or gender identity; or medical complexity: those who had to perform self-monitoring of symptoms during pregnancy for any complication, including hypertension, gestational diabetes, additional scans for predisposition to genetic complications, or previous pregnancy loss. A lack of ethnic diversity within leadership roles meant guidelines failed to consider the needs of minority groups who subsequently received sub-standard maternity care. <br/><br/>Conclusion: This study affirms the negative effects the pandemic had on maternity care-seeking and experience, whilst highlighting the need for policy to prioritise marginalised groups, patient-centredness, and the wellbeing of HCPs to rebuild a resilient maternity service.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-04-22
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The perceptions of maternity care-seeking and care-giving experiences during a health-system shock:A qualitative study with healthcare professionals and policy makers in the UK with a focus on care for marginalised groups

Ingrid Wolfe, Tisha Dasgupta, Alice McGreevy, Eugene C. Nelson et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

The perceptions of maternity care-seeking and care-giving experiences during a health-system shock:A qualitative study with healthcare professionals and policy makers in the UK with a focus on care for marginalised groups

Ingrid Wolfe, Tisha Dasgupta, Alice McGreevy, Eugene C. Nelson, Abigail Easter, Neelam Heera-Shergill, Gillian Horgan, Florence Tydeman, Kathryn; id_orcid 0000-0003-0958-6725 Dalrymple, Emma; id_orcid 0000-0002-8143-4403 Duncan, Sergio A.; id_orcid 0000-0001-7177-3471 Silverio, Peter; id_orcid 0000-0003-4136-3070 von Dadelszen, Harriet Boulding, Sara; id_orcid 0000-0001-7979-0508 White, Hiten; id_orcid 0000-0003-2564-7348 Mistry, Marina Soley Bori, Lara Rowell, Debra Bick, Laura Magee, Asma Khalil, Aricca Van Citters, ? ?, Paul Townsend Seed, Julia; id_orcid 0000-0003-0748-0871 Fox-Rushby, Yanzhong; id_orcid 0000-0002-0768-1676 Wang, Lucilla; id_orcid 0000-0003-1100-2821 Poston
article en

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-providers [HCPs] and policymakers had to re-organise and adapt to maternity services rapidly during the pandemic, and as a result, women’s care-seeking and experience within maternity services were affected. <br/><br/>Aims: This study aims to explore HCPs’ and policymakers’ perspectives of maternity care-seeking and experiences, with a particular focus on marginalised groups. We take a future-focused approach to informing policy, to re-build UK maternity services which remain beleaguered. <br/><br/>Method: Semi-structed in-depth interviews were undertaken with 21 HCPs and 20 policymakers across the four nations of the UK, to discuss their perception of maternity care-seeking and experiences during the pandemic. Data were analysed using Template Analysis, based on an extended version of the Candidacy framework. <br/><br/>Results: HCPs struggled to navigate reconfiguration of services and implement changes. It was challenging to strike a balance between the need to protect women from the virus, whilst maintaining high quality care. The transition to virtual care hindered HCPs ability to identify patients’ claim to candidacy, affecting the ability to deliver safe and high-quality care. The standardisation of self-monitoring and virtual care, although beneficial for some, adversely affected those with medical and social complexity. Policy had failed to address inequalities prior to service reconfiguration, making it harder for HCPs to engage with marginalised groups. This included service users with social complexity: lack of social support, mental health problems, or belonging to a minority group relating to sexual orientation or gender identity; or medical complexity: those who had to perform self-monitoring of symptoms during pregnancy for any complication, including hypertension, gestational diabetes, additional scans for predisposition to genetic complications, or previous pregnancy loss. A lack of ethnic diversity within leadership roles meant guidelines failed to consider the needs of minority groups who subsequently received sub-standard maternity care. <br/><br/>Conclusion: This study affirms the negative effects the pandemic had on maternity care-seeking and experience, whilst highlighting the need for policy to prioritise marginalised groups, patient-centredness, and the wellbeing of HCPs to rebuild a resilient maternity service.

Research Portal (King's College London)
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US), University of Liverpool (GB), King's College London (GB), St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Women's & Children's Health Research Institute (AU), Sisters of Charity Health System (US), Sisters of Charity Hospital (US), Institute of Population and Public Health (CA), Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.