Current landscape for outcome prediction in patients with cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical state of primary cardiac dysfunction characterized by tissue hypoperfusion and cellular hypoxia, with in-hospital mortality rates persistently between 30% and 50%. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence to redefine risk stratification through a dynamic, multi-modal lens, moving beyond static snapshots to prioritize longitudinal assessment aimed at anticipating clinical instability, therapeutic response, or physiological recovery. The evolution of CS staging is evaluated, specifically the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) five-stage continuum, which tracks patient progression from "At risk" (Stage A) to "Extremis" (Stage E) and identifies critical windows for preemptive stabilization in Stage B. Essential hemodynamic "signposts" are examined, including cardiac index, right atrial pressure over pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio and pulmonary artery pulsatility index, which help identify high-risk phenotypes like the right-dominant CS. We highlight the role of echocardiography, lung ultrasonography and Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score as real-time biomarkers for monitoring forward flow and central and systemic congestion. Ultimately, accurate prognostication requires a multi-modal risk portrait integrating shock severity, biological phenotype, and patient-specific modifiers to identify non-responders early and allow for the timely treatment escalation, or proper de-escalation of intensive therapies as clinical improvement occurs. In this context, predictive approaches are primarily intended to anticipate imminent clinical deterioration or recovery, whereas prognostic models aim to estimate outcome probabilities, particularly mortality risk, once cardiogenic shock is established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Cardiology
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2026.2664540
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current landscape for outcome prediction in patients with cardiogenic shock

Ilaria Pagliassotto, Pier Paolo Bocchino, Riccardo Pilia, Filippo Angelini et al.
Future Cardiology
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Current landscape for outcome prediction in patients with cardiogenic shock

Ilaria Pagliassotto, Pier Paolo Bocchino, Riccardo Pilia, Filippo Angelini, G O Gallone, Maria Luisa Carbone, G M De Ferrari, Simone Frea, Lucia Elena Laiso
article en

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical state of primary cardiac dysfunction characterized by tissue hypoperfusion and cellular hypoxia, with in-hospital mortality rates persistently between 30% and 50%. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence to redefine risk stratification through a dynamic, multi-modal lens, moving beyond static snapshots to prioritize longitudinal assessment aimed at anticipating clinical instability, therapeutic response, or physiological recovery. The evolution of CS staging is evaluated, specifically the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) five-stage continuum, which tracks patient progression from "At risk" (Stage A) to "Extremis" (Stage E) and identifies critical windows for preemptive stabilization in Stage B. Essential hemodynamic "signposts" are examined, including cardiac index, right atrial pressure over pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio and pulmonary artery pulsatility index, which help identify high-risk phenotypes like the right-dominant CS. We highlight the role of echocardiography, lung ultrasonography and Venous Excess Ultrasound (VExUS) score as real-time biomarkers for monitoring forward flow and central and systemic congestion. Ultimately, accurate prognostication requires a multi-modal risk portrait integrating shock severity, biological phenotype, and patient-specific modifiers to identify non-responders early and allow for the timely treatment escalation, or proper de-escalation of intensive therapies as clinical improvement occurs. In this context, predictive approaches are primarily intended to anticipate imminent clinical deterioration or recovery, whereas prognostic models aim to estimate outcome probabilities, particularly mortality risk, once cardiogenic shock is established.

Future Cardiology
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.