The Document Is Not the Authority: AI-Synthesized Identity Documents and the Collapse of Document-Centric Governance
AI-generated death certificates are a symptom. The vulnerability they expose is structural: identity systems built for a pre-AI world assume that documents are authoritative, that identity is continuous, and that state transitions are rare customer-service events rather than security-critical governance operations. This technical note maps ten exploit classes that share the same underlying structural failure, analyzes each against the APR-Series invariant framework, and identifies the specific missing invariant that makes each exploit possible. The post-mortem identity case receives extended treatment as the canonical example of substrate-level identity collapse. The core finding: AI did not create these vulnerabilities. AI made the exploits cheap. The absence of substrate-level identity governance is what created the attack surface. Documents cannot be the substrate. Lineage must be.
Authors
- Narnaiezzsshaa Truong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1964-6440)
Institutions
- American Rock Mechanics Association (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-05-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20112130
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00