Management and productivity of corn–alfalfa intercropping systems in the southeastern United States

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) is widely used in the southeastern U.S., but its low protein concentration and drought susceptibility often limit productivity and nutritive value in corn silage systems for ruminant livestock. Intercropping forages into corn‐based systems may improve nutritive value and system resilience. A two‐year field study in Tennessee evaluated herbage mass (HM), botanical composition, nutritive value, and corn silage yield in four systems: alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) alone (AA), corn alone (CA), alfalfa intercropped with corn (AC), and alfalfa intercropped with corn and crabgrass ( Digitaria ciliaris L.) (ACC). Herbage mass was influenced by year but not by cropping system, averaging 2556 lbs dry matter (DM) acre −1 . Alfalfa persistence declined over time, particularly when crabgrass was included, while crabgrass proportion increased under drier conditions. Crude protein was highest in alfalfa‐based systems but declined as alfalfa persistence decreased. Crabgrass inclusion improved fiber digestibility and helped maintain nutritive value when alfalfa declined. Corn silage yield was greater in 2023 than in 2024; CA outyielded intercropped systems in 2023, whereas no yield differences were observed in 2024 (4817 lbs DM acre −1 ). Under Middle Tennessee conditions, alfalfa‐corn intercropping alone is unlikely to improve productivity due to the limited alfalfa persistence during hot, dry summers, although crabgrass can help maintain forage nutritive value and productivity. Irrigation and targeted management may be necessary to maintain long‐term system benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.70124
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management and productivity of corn–alfalfa intercropping systems in the southeastern United States

Renata La Guardia Nave, Andrew P. Griffith, Virginia R. Sykes, Otávio Goulart de Almeida et al.
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Management and productivity of corn–alfalfa intercropping systems in the southeastern United States

Renata La Guardia Nave, Andrew P. Griffith, Virginia R. Sykes, Otávio Goulart de Almeida, Kellie Walters, Yannick Matthew Roberts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) is widely used in the southeastern U.S., but its low protein concentration and drought susceptibility often limit productivity and nutritive value in corn silage systems for ruminant livestock. Intercropping forages into corn‐based systems may improve nutritive value and system resilience. A two‐year field study in Tennessee evaluated herbage mass (HM), botanical composition, nutritive value, and corn silage yield in four systems: alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) alone (AA), corn alone (CA), alfalfa intercropped with corn (AC), and alfalfa intercropped with corn and crabgrass ( Digitaria ciliaris L.) (ACC). Herbage mass was influenced by year but not by cropping system, averaging 2556 lbs dry matter (DM) acre −1 . Alfalfa persistence declined over time, particularly when crabgrass was included, while crabgrass proportion increased under drier conditions. Crude protein was highest in alfalfa‐based systems but declined as alfalfa persistence decreased. Crabgrass inclusion improved fiber digestibility and helped maintain nutritive value when alfalfa declined. Corn silage yield was greater in 2023 than in 2024; CA outyielded intercropped systems in 2023, whereas no yield differences were observed in 2024 (4817 lbs DM acre −1 ). Under Middle Tennessee conditions, alfalfa‐corn intercropping alone is unlikely to improve productivity due to the limited alfalfa persistence during hot, dry summers, although crabgrass can help maintain forage nutritive value and productivity. Irrigation and targeted management may be necessary to maintain long‐term system benefits.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 12(1)
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Management and productivity of corn–alfalfa intercropping systems in the southeastern United States — Renata La Guardia Nave, Andrew P. Griffith, et al. · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS