Brief report: A cross‐sectional survey of provider engagement with family members following patient drug overdose death

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe provider preparedness and experiences engaging families after a patient overdose death. METHODS: We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses to a national survey of interdisciplinary providers. RESULTS: Participants (n = 524; 47,937 invited) agreed that providers should communicate with a patient's family after an overdose death (78.2% agreed), yet few felt very well prepared to do so (22.6%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Providers inconsistently contacted families despite believing these interactions are opportunities to improve family and provider coping. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: There is a potential need for interventions addressing this discrepancy between providers' desired behaviors and practice contacting families following a patient death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal on Addictions
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.70172
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brief report: A cross‐sectional survey of provider engagement with family members following patient drug overdose death

Amy M. Yule, Jessica B. Calihan, Kathryn Cates‐Wessel, Frances R. Levin et al.
American Journal on Addictions
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Brief report: A cross‐sectional survey of provider engagement with family members following patient drug overdose death

Amy M. Yule, Jessica B. Calihan, Kathryn Cates‐Wessel, Frances R. Levin, Agata Bereznicka, Cale N. Basaraba
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe provider preparedness and experiences engaging families after a patient overdose death. METHODS: We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses to a national survey of interdisciplinary providers. RESULTS: Participants (n = 524; 47,937 invited) agreed that providers should communicate with a patient's family after an overdose death (78.2% agreed), yet few felt very well prepared to do so (22.6%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Providers inconsistently contacted families despite believing these interactions are opportunities to improve family and provider coping. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: There is a potential need for interventions addressing this discrepancy between providers' desired behaviors and practice contacting families following a patient death.

American Journal on Addictions
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), New York State Department of State (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts (US), American Society of Addiction Medicine (US), New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute (US), American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (US), Columbia University (US)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.