Temporal therapeutic mismatch in frail older adults with heart Failure: A framework for Frailty-Informed prescribing

Heart failure in older adults increasingly occurs in the context of frailty, multimorbidity, and declining physiological reserve. In this population, therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in selected clinical trial populations does not automatically translate into meaningful clinical benefit. This discrepancy may create tension between guideline-driven care and goal-concordant prescribing. This narrative review proposes a conceptual framework to distinguish therapeutic efficacy from clinical relevance in ageing heart failure populations. Using tafamidis for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and apixaban for atrial fibrillation as illustrative paradigms, we examine how frailty severity, competing risks, life expectancy, and therapy-specific time-to-benefit influence the likelihood that a treatment will provide meaningful benefit for an individual patient. Disease-modifying therapies with delayed benefit may lose proportionality when lag-time-to-benefit exceeds the patient’s anticipated window of preserved survival or functional autonomy. In contrast, preventive strategies that rapidly reduce autonomy-threatening events may retain broader clinical relevance across vulnerability strata, although individualized reassessment remains essential. We introduce the concept of temporal therapeutic mismatch, defined as a situation in which expected therapeutic benefit occurs beyond the patient’s remaining functional trajectory or life expectancy. A pragmatic framework integrating frailty severity, estimated life expectancy, competing risks, therapy-specific time-to-benefit, and patient-defined goals is proposed to support proportional prescribing. In ageing cardiovascular populations, high-quality care requires moving beyond efficacy alone toward frailty-informed clinical relevance. Structured reassessment—including consideration of non-initiation or deprescribing when appropriate—represents a key component of patient-centered cardiovascular care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.101937
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal therapeutic mismatch in frail older adults with heart Failure: A framework for Frailty-Informed prescribing

Olivier Maurou, Rémi Esser, M. Harboun, Vincenzo Palermo et al.
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Temporal therapeutic mismatch in frail older adults with heart Failure: A framework for Frailty-Informed prescribing

Olivier Maurou, Rémi Esser, M. Harboun, Vincenzo Palermo, Marine Larbaneix, Christine Farges, Marlène Esteban, Alejandro Mondragon, Wafa Ben Ghezala, Sophie Nisse-Durgeat
article en

Abstract

Heart failure in older adults increasingly occurs in the context of frailty, multimorbidity, and declining physiological reserve. In this population, therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in selected clinical trial populations does not automatically translate into meaningful clinical benefit. This discrepancy may create tension between guideline-driven care and goal-concordant prescribing. This narrative review proposes a conceptual framework to distinguish therapeutic efficacy from clinical relevance in ageing heart failure populations. Using tafamidis for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and apixaban for atrial fibrillation as illustrative paradigms, we examine how frailty severity, competing risks, life expectancy, and therapy-specific time-to-benefit influence the likelihood that a treatment will provide meaningful benefit for an individual patient. Disease-modifying therapies with delayed benefit may lose proportionality when lag-time-to-benefit exceeds the patient’s anticipated window of preserved survival or functional autonomy. In contrast, preventive strategies that rapidly reduce autonomy-threatening events may retain broader clinical relevance across vulnerability strata, although individualized reassessment remains essential. We introduce the concept of temporal therapeutic mismatch, defined as a situation in which expected therapeutic benefit occurs beyond the patient’s remaining functional trajectory or life expectancy. A pragmatic framework integrating frailty severity, estimated life expectancy, competing risks, therapy-specific time-to-benefit, and patient-defined goals is proposed to support proportional prescribing. In ageing cardiovascular populations, high-quality care requires moving beyond efficacy alone toward frailty-informed clinical relevance. Structured reassessment—including consideration of non-initiation or deprescribing when appropriate—represents a key component of patient-centered cardiovascular care.

IJC Heart & VasculatureVol. 64
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue (FR), Hôpital Marie Lannelongue (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Hôpital La Porte Verte (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.