Teaching Six ‘Blink’ Features Reduces General Endoscopists’ Cancer Miss-Rate in Image-Based Assessment of Large Colorectal Polyps

Background&Aims: Accurate cancer detection in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) remains challenging for general endoscopists. We evaluated whether teaching six gross morphological "Blink" features could improve the accuracy of cancer detection. Methods: This prospective interventional study assessed general endoscopists evaluating 20 LNPCP images (7 with histologically-confirmed submucosal invasive cancer including 4 deep invasions ≥1000µm, 13 benign). Participants assessed images before and after a 2-minute educational video introducing six Blink features: spontaneous bleeding, depression, fold deformation, extra redness, ulceration, and chicken-skin mucosa. Primary outcome was change in miss-rate for cancer detection. Generalized linear mixed models accounted for clustering within raters and polyps. Results: 165 participants included gastroenterology consultants (63.6%), trainees (21.2%), students (1.8%) and colorectal surgeons (13.3%) with a median colonoscopy experience of 6.5 years. Post-intervention the cancer miss-rate decreased four-fold from 26.6% (95%CI 13.4-46.0) to 5.7%(95%CI 2.4-12.8). This improvement was consistent across experience levels. The false alarm rate increased less-than two-fold from 25.0% (95%CI 15.1-38.5) to 42.2%(95%CI 27.7-58.2). Multivariable analysis identified spontaneous bleeding (OR 3.92, 95%CI 3.11-4.96), extra redness (OR 3.66, 95%CI 3.09-4.33), and depression (OR 3.06, 95%CI 2.58-3.64) as independent predictors of cancer amongst general endoscopists. Mean Blink features per polyp were 1.08 (95%CI 0.82–1.40) for benign lesions versus 2.46 (95%CI 1.85–3.12) for cancers. Conclusions: Teaching six Blink features to general endoscopists led to a 4x reduction in cancer miss-rates in an image-based evaluation. While specificity decreased, this trade-off favors patient safety, as false-positives trigger established clinical safeguards while missed cancers risk inappropriate endoscopic resection with potentially irreversible consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2868-4812
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Six ‘Blink’ Features Reduces General Endoscopists’ Cancer Miss-Rate in Image-Based Assessment of Large Colorectal Polyps

Tamás Tornai, S Smeets, Lynn Debels, Vikash Goolab Lala et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Teaching Six ‘Blink’ Features Reduces General Endoscopists’ Cancer Miss-Rate in Image-Based Assessment of Large Colorectal Polyps

Tamás Tornai, S Smeets, Lynn Debels, Vikash Goolab Lala, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Maria Eva Argenziano, Roland Valori, David J Tate, Anne Hoorens, John T Anderson, Lobke Desomer
article en

Abstract

Background&Aims: Accurate cancer detection in large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) remains challenging for general endoscopists. We evaluated whether teaching six gross morphological "Blink" features could improve the accuracy of cancer detection. Methods: This prospective interventional study assessed general endoscopists evaluating 20 LNPCP images (7 with histologically-confirmed submucosal invasive cancer including 4 deep invasions ≥1000µm, 13 benign). Participants assessed images before and after a 2-minute educational video introducing six Blink features: spontaneous bleeding, depression, fold deformation, extra redness, ulceration, and chicken-skin mucosa. Primary outcome was change in miss-rate for cancer detection. Generalized linear mixed models accounted for clustering within raters and polyps. Results: 165 participants included gastroenterology consultants (63.6%), trainees (21.2%), students (1.8%) and colorectal surgeons (13.3%) with a median colonoscopy experience of 6.5 years. Post-intervention the cancer miss-rate decreased four-fold from 26.6% (95%CI 13.4-46.0) to 5.7%(95%CI 2.4-12.8). This improvement was consistent across experience levels. The false alarm rate increased less-than two-fold from 25.0% (95%CI 15.1-38.5) to 42.2%(95%CI 27.7-58.2). Multivariable analysis identified spontaneous bleeding (OR 3.92, 95%CI 3.11-4.96), extra redness (OR 3.66, 95%CI 3.09-4.33), and depression (OR 3.06, 95%CI 2.58-3.64) as independent predictors of cancer amongst general endoscopists. Mean Blink features per polyp were 1.08 (95%CI 0.82–1.40) for benign lesions versus 2.46 (95%CI 1.85–3.12) for cancers. Conclusions: Teaching six Blink features to general endoscopists led to a 4x reduction in cancer miss-rates in an image-based evaluation. While specificity decreased, this trade-off favors patient safety, as false-positives trigger established clinical safeguards while missed cancers risk inappropriate endoscopic resection with potentially irreversible consequences.

Endoscopy International Open
Semmelweis University (HU), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Johannesburg Hospital (ZA), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Ghent University (BE), Wits University Donald Gordon Medical Centre (ZA), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE), AZ Delta (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.