Personal networks and parliamentary experience: why opposition initiated legislative proposals are adopted

Abstract There is extensive research on legislation co-sponsorship, but information on why opposition-initiated legislation is adopted is scarce. This article fills this gap by identifying the reasons behind legislation adoption in Romania in the 2020–2024 parliament as the least likely case where opposition could push laws through. Our thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with MPs shows the importance of personal networks, parliamentary experience, budget impact, and public pressure. In some instances, especially with salient issues, proposals’ innovation and specificity also boosted their adoption. Somewhat counterintuitively, constituency interests, ideological proximity, and MP expertise did not matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsag015
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personal networks and parliamentary experience: why opposition initiated legislative proposals are adopted

PAUL ȚAP, IONUT MOLDOVAN, Claudiu Marian, Sergiu Gherghina
Parliamentary Affairs
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Personal networks and parliamentary experience: why opposition initiated legislative proposals are adopted

PAUL ȚAP, IONUT MOLDOVAN, Claudiu Marian, Sergiu Gherghina
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is extensive research on legislation co-sponsorship, but information on why opposition-initiated legislation is adopted is scarce. This article fills this gap by identifying the reasons behind legislation adoption in Romania in the 2020–2024 parliament as the least likely case where opposition could push laws through. Our thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with MPs shows the importance of personal networks, parliamentary experience, budget impact, and public pressure. In some instances, especially with salient issues, proposals’ innovation and specificity also boosted their adoption. Somewhat counterintuitively, constituency interests, ideological proximity, and MP expertise did not matter.

Parliamentary Affairs
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), University of Glasgow (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.