Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis Without Detectable KIT Mutation: A Debilitating Course and Therapeutic Challenge

ABSTRACT Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal hematologic neoplasm driven by activating KIT mutations, particularly D816V. Indolent SM typically follows a stable course, progression to higher‐burden subtypes is uncommon. However, management of KIT‐negative disease remains poorly defined. We describe rare and clinically challenging case of KIT‐negative indolent systemic mastocytosis progressing to smoldering systemic mastocytosis (SSM) with progressive symptoms and limited treatment options. A female in her 30s with almost 10 years history of indolent SM developed progressive constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal distress, diffuse pain, and worsening cutaneous lesions. Serum tryptase nearly doubled from 46.2 ng/mL to 88.5 ng/mL. Repeat bone marrow biopsy demonstrated marked disease progression with 40% mast cell infiltration (CD117+, CD25+), compared to 5%–10% at initial diagnosis. Imaging revealed mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Molecular testing was negative for KIT D816V and other KIT mutations. She was diagnosed with smoldering systemic mastocytosis, was managed symptomatically with antihistamines, antiemetics, cromolyn sodium and an epinephrine auto‐injector for anaphylaxis control. Despite maximal anti‐mediator therapy, symptoms remained severe: persistent nausea, vomiting, bone pain, dizziness, skin lumps, skin rash and generalized discomfort. Omalizumab was initiated for refractory mediator‐related symptoms but was discontinued because of treatment‐associated anaphylaxis. Given the absence of detectable D816V mutation, imatinib was initiated and was associated with reduced epinephrine use and stabilization of cutaneous disease. This case highlights several clinically relevant considerations: nonadvanced SM subtypes may carry substantial morbidity, progression can occur even without detectable KIT mutations, and therapeutic decisions in mutation‐negative disease require individualized molecular and clinical reassessment. As targeted therapies increasingly shape mastocytosis treatment algorithms, improved understanding of therapeutic responsiveness in KIT‐mutation–negative SSM is essential to optimize management and avoid treatment delays in symptomatic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Nexus
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnx2.70025
Primary Topic
Mast cells and histamine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis Without Detectable KIT Mutation: A Debilitating Course and Therapeutic Challenge

M Bishara, Joane Titus, Medina Esenbekova, Layo Akinrinwoye et al.
Cancer Nexus
Mast cells and histamine
article

Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis Without Detectable KIT Mutation: A Debilitating Course and Therapeutic Challenge

M Bishara, Joane Titus, Medina Esenbekova, Layo Akinrinwoye, Homeniuk Anna, Leila Metellus
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal hematologic neoplasm driven by activating KIT mutations, particularly D816V. Indolent SM typically follows a stable course, progression to higher‐burden subtypes is uncommon. However, management of KIT‐negative disease remains poorly defined. We describe rare and clinically challenging case of KIT‐negative indolent systemic mastocytosis progressing to smoldering systemic mastocytosis (SSM) with progressive symptoms and limited treatment options. A female in her 30s with almost 10 years history of indolent SM developed progressive constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal distress, diffuse pain, and worsening cutaneous lesions. Serum tryptase nearly doubled from 46.2 ng/mL to 88.5 ng/mL. Repeat bone marrow biopsy demonstrated marked disease progression with 40% mast cell infiltration (CD117+, CD25+), compared to 5%–10% at initial diagnosis. Imaging revealed mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Molecular testing was negative for KIT D816V and other KIT mutations. She was diagnosed with smoldering systemic mastocytosis, was managed symptomatically with antihistamines, antiemetics, cromolyn sodium and an epinephrine auto‐injector for anaphylaxis control. Despite maximal anti‐mediator therapy, symptoms remained severe: persistent nausea, vomiting, bone pain, dizziness, skin lumps, skin rash and generalized discomfort. Omalizumab was initiated for refractory mediator‐related symptoms but was discontinued because of treatment‐associated anaphylaxis. Given the absence of detectable D816V mutation, imatinib was initiated and was associated with reduced epinephrine use and stabilization of cutaneous disease. This case highlights several clinically relevant considerations: nonadvanced SM subtypes may carry substantial morbidity, progression can occur even without detectable KIT mutations, and therapeutic decisions in mutation‐negative disease require individualized molecular and clinical reassessment. As targeted therapies increasingly shape mastocytosis treatment algorithms, improved understanding of therapeutic responsiveness in KIT‐mutation–negative SSM is essential to optimize management and avoid treatment delays in symptomatic patients.

Cancer Nexus
UPMC Central Pa (US), Central Penn College (US), St. George's School (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mast cells and histamine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.