A refined numerical model for assessing low-pressure effects on ski-jump atomization at high-altitude dams
Abstract Accurately predicting ski-jump flood discharge atomization is crucial for designing effective disaster-mitigation measures, particularly because low ambient pressure increases the risk of atomized protection in high-altitude regions. However, owing to the complex effects of low ambient pressure on strongly coupled atomized field sources, it is difficult to fully describe the comprehensive behaviour of such sources theoretically, which limits the further development of random splashing numerical models. In this paper, a refined random splashing numerical model characterized by low ambient pressure is developed based on experimental results and applied to high-altitude earth–rockfill dam projects. Compared with the reference ambient pressure condition ( P 0 = 101.457 kPa), which corresponds to the same flood discharge flow, a decrease in ambient pressure by 0.1P 0 leads to a maximum change rate not exceeding 10 m for the characteristic boundary of the 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity line at the QX Hydropower Station. This observation also applies to both the 40 mm/h and 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity lines at the RM Hydropower Station. For the two groups of flip bucket types designed for the RM Hydropower station, the loads associated with atomized protection are predominantly concentrated on the left bank. The maximum height of the 10 mm/h atomized rain intensity line affected by atomized rain ranges from 0.83 to 0.85 times the maximum dam height of 315 m. The distance between the farthest downstream boundary and the Spillway No. 3 outlet is between 666.80 and 692.40 metres. Since the flip bucket shape variations only slightly affect the atomization zone extent, further optimization is needed. The study can provide valuable methodological and decision-making support for safeguarding against existing and potential impacts within areas affected by flood discharge atomization from high-altitude hydropower stations.
Authors
- Yongsheng Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1655-8271)
- Wenjuan Gou
- Fang Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-7491)
- Cundong Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8345-4701)
- Bin Ma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-7846)
- Jijian Lian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4334-4033)
- Dan Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6407-1055)
- Jizhong Shi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3680-9594)
- Jinxin Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8519-5299)
- Dongming Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1332-3904)
- Huiping Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8687-9915)
Institutions
- Tianjin University (CN)
- Yalong Hydro (China) (CN)
- Powerchina Huadong Engineering Corporation (China) (CN)
- Zhejiang University of Water Resource and Electric Power (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Mountain Science
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-9995-3
- Primary Topic
- Landslides and related hazards
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
- Tianjin University
- Zhejiang University
- Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
- Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province