Multi-Criteria decision framework for commercial and advanced CO2 capture technologies: a data-driven review and assessment for industrial decarbonization

• Multi-criteria model ranks commercial and advanced CO 2 capture systems. • TRL, energy use, cost, purity, and modularity form core metrics. • SMR case study validates framework under real process and pressure data. • Hybrid capture chains outperform single-technology strategies. • Results guide project design, investment, and decarbonization policy. Carbon capture remains the most energy and cost-intensive stage in the CCUS chain, and its large-scale deployment is still constrained by integration complexity, economic uncertainty, and a lack of unified tools that link technology readiness with sector-specific deployment needs. Unlike conventional reviews that summarize technology status, this work introduces a data-driven, multi-criteria framework that quantitatively evaluates technology readiness, performance, and deployment feasibility using real licensors and industrial datasets. This review consolidates global evidence from more than 70 commercial and advanced CO 2 capture technologies and develops a multi-criteria decision framework to select the best carbon capture technology for the energy systems. To facilitate systematic comparison across major technology families such as chemical absorption, physical absorption, adsorption, cryogenic, chemical looping, and membrane, the framework integrates quantifiable indicators such as TRL, energy consumption, capture efficiency, cost metrics, modularity, and industrial applicability. The analysis reveals that the post-combustion absorption system dominates current deployment, accounting for over 85% of operational plants, while emerging cryogenic and looping processes show promise for high-pressure and high-purity applications. Energy requirements range from 0.4 to 5.2 GJ/tCO 2 depending on process type and maturity, with potential cost reduction of up to 40% in next-generation designs. By linking technical performance with deployment feasibility, the framework turns diverse industrial and licensor data into a structured roadmap for technology selection and further enhancement in energy consumption through the utilization of green technologies. It connects innovation in technologies and engineering metrics with investment and policy priorities, supporting scalable and low-carbon capture strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101936
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria decision framework for commercial and advanced CO2 capture technologies: a data-driven review and assessment for industrial decarbonization

Muhammad Abdul Qyyum, Shaima Al-Salmani, Dr. Muhammad Bilal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Multi-Criteria decision framework for commercial and advanced CO2 capture technologies: a data-driven review and assessment for industrial decarbonization

Muhammad Abdul Qyyum, Shaima Al-Salmani, Dr. Muhammad Bilal
article en

Abstract

• Multi-criteria model ranks commercial and advanced CO 2 capture systems. • TRL, energy use, cost, purity, and modularity form core metrics. • SMR case study validates framework under real process and pressure data. • Hybrid capture chains outperform single-technology strategies. • Results guide project design, investment, and decarbonization policy. Carbon capture remains the most energy and cost-intensive stage in the CCUS chain, and its large-scale deployment is still constrained by integration complexity, economic uncertainty, and a lack of unified tools that link technology readiness with sector-specific deployment needs. Unlike conventional reviews that summarize technology status, this work introduces a data-driven, multi-criteria framework that quantitatively evaluates technology readiness, performance, and deployment feasibility using real licensors and industrial datasets. This review consolidates global evidence from more than 70 commercial and advanced CO 2 capture technologies and develops a multi-criteria decision framework to select the best carbon capture technology for the energy systems. To facilitate systematic comparison across major technology families such as chemical absorption, physical absorption, adsorption, cryogenic, chemical looping, and membrane, the framework integrates quantifiable indicators such as TRL, energy consumption, capture efficiency, cost metrics, modularity, and industrial applicability. The analysis reveals that the post-combustion absorption system dominates current deployment, accounting for over 85% of operational plants, while emerging cryogenic and looping processes show promise for high-pressure and high-purity applications. Energy requirements range from 0.4 to 5.2 GJ/tCO 2 depending on process type and maturity, with potential cost reduction of up to 40% in next-generation designs. By linking technical performance with deployment feasibility, the framework turns diverse industrial and licensor data into a structured roadmap for technology selection and further enhancement in energy consumption through the utilization of green technologies. It connects innovation in technologies and engineering metrics with investment and policy priorities, supporting scalable and low-carbon capture strategies.

Energy Conversion and Management X
Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.