Varieties of Democracy Aid Approaches: The Role of Donors' Domestic Ideology

ABSTRACT After the end of the Cold War, DAC donors increased their efforts of democracy promotion in developing countries. Among other instruments, DAC donors increasingly use democracy aid to improve democracy abroad. However, DAC donors differ in their allocation and delivery strategy of democracy aid. Some donors favour a bottom‐up approach which consists of enhancing civil society participation. Other donors favour a top‐down approach which consists of enhancing recipient states' institutions. This study argues that donors' political economy ideologies entail different conceptions of democracy, leading to distinct theories of democratization and, consequently, democracy promotion approaches. These ideological underpinnings shape the priority, organization and staff of national aid bureaucracies, which in turn influences patterns of democracy aid allocation. To test the hypothesis, this article employs a country‐year fixed effect regression model using data from the OECD Credit Reporting System (CRS) dataset. This dataset contains detailed information on all democracy aid projects delivered by the 23 DAC donors in 156 recipient countries from 1990 to 2021. Results confirm that DAC donors' domestic ideology influences democracy aid approaches. These findings contribute to the understanding of the varieties of democracy promotion, democracy aid allocation strategies and effectiveness in developing countries' democratization process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70083
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Varieties of Democracy Aid Approaches: The Role of Donors' Domestic Ideology

Jean-Baptiste Puginier
Journal of International Development
International Development and Aid
article

Varieties of Democracy Aid Approaches: The Role of Donors' Domestic Ideology

Jean-Baptiste Puginier
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT After the end of the Cold War, DAC donors increased their efforts of democracy promotion in developing countries. Among other instruments, DAC donors increasingly use democracy aid to improve democracy abroad. However, DAC donors differ in their allocation and delivery strategy of democracy aid. Some donors favour a bottom‐up approach which consists of enhancing civil society participation. Other donors favour a top‐down approach which consists of enhancing recipient states' institutions. This study argues that donors' political economy ideologies entail different conceptions of democracy, leading to distinct theories of democratization and, consequently, democracy promotion approaches. These ideological underpinnings shape the priority, organization and staff of national aid bureaucracies, which in turn influences patterns of democracy aid allocation. To test the hypothesis, this article employs a country‐year fixed effect regression model using data from the OECD Credit Reporting System (CRS) dataset. This dataset contains detailed information on all democracy aid projects delivered by the 23 DAC donors in 156 recipient countries from 1990 to 2021. Results confirm that DAC donors' domestic ideology influences democracy aid approaches. These findings contribute to the understanding of the varieties of democracy promotion, democracy aid allocation strategies and effectiveness in developing countries' democratization process.

Journal of International Development
University of Geneva (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.