Trade-offs in proton and photon radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background and Purpose</h3> Pituitary Adenomas (PAs) are tumours proximal to sensitive organs of interest (OOIs). These tumours may be well-suited for proton therapy due to the Bragg peak. Few studies have evaluated the potential dose-volume benefits of protons for PAs in the pencil beam scanning era. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> Treatment plans for 15 PA patients were made using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), coplanar- and- non-coplanar photon therapy. Dose distributions to OOIs were compared using the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison Group's (ROCOCO) Performance Scoring System (RPSS), which estimates adverse event (AE) burden. <h3>Results</h3> Proton therapy resulted in significantly lower overall estimated AE burden than both photon modalities (median RPSS: 1.09 vs. 1.24; p < 0.005). This reduction was due to significantly lower D<sub>40 %</sub> to the hippocampi. For the right hippocampus, median D<sub>40 %</sub> (EQD<sub>Gy2</sub>) was 1.01 Gy with IMPT, compared with 4.9 Gy for coplanar and 3.2 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Doses with protons and non-coplanar photons were significantly lower than those for coplanar photons (p < 0.001). For the left hippocampus, IMPT achieved a median D<sub>40 %</sub> of 0.7 Gy, compared with 5.0 Gy for coplanar and 2.7 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Non-coplanar was significantly lower than coplanar (p < 0.001), while IMPT was significantly lower than both photon modalities (p < 0.001). Protons delivered higher doses to the brainstem, optic nerves, chiasm, and the hypothalami. <h3>Conclusions</h3> These findings indicate that IMPT can significantly reduce AEs to critical brain structures. Although considerations of cost, accessibility, and clinical validation remain, IMPT may offer a meaningful therapeutic advantage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100994
Primary Topic
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-offs in proton and photon radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

Ans Swinnen, Marleen Kars, Jasper van Aalst, Daniëlle B. P. Eekers et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
article

Trade-offs in proton and photon radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas

Ans Swinnen, Marleen Kars, Jasper van Aalst, Daniëlle B. P. Eekers, Inge Compter, Catharina M.L. Zegers, David Hofstede, R. Emmah, Marloes Nogarede, Ruud Houben, Marlies E. Granzier, Nikolina E. Birimac, Yasin Temel, David J.A. Palm, John Paulissen
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background and Purpose</h3> Pituitary Adenomas (PAs) are tumours proximal to sensitive organs of interest (OOIs). These tumours may be well-suited for proton therapy due to the Bragg peak. Few studies have evaluated the potential dose-volume benefits of protons for PAs in the pencil beam scanning era. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> Treatment plans for 15 PA patients were made using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), coplanar- and- non-coplanar photon therapy. Dose distributions to OOIs were compared using the Radiation Oncology Collaborative Comparison Group's (ROCOCO) Performance Scoring System (RPSS), which estimates adverse event (AE) burden. <h3>Results</h3> Proton therapy resulted in significantly lower overall estimated AE burden than both photon modalities (median RPSS: 1.09 vs. 1.24; p < 0.005). This reduction was due to significantly lower D<sub>40 %</sub> to the hippocampi. For the right hippocampus, median D<sub>40 %</sub> (EQD<sub>Gy2</sub>) was 1.01 Gy with IMPT, compared with 4.9 Gy for coplanar and 3.2 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Doses with protons and non-coplanar photons were significantly lower than those for coplanar photons (p < 0.001). For the left hippocampus, IMPT achieved a median D<sub>40 %</sub> of 0.7 Gy, compared with 5.0 Gy for coplanar and 2.7 Gy for non-coplanar photons. Non-coplanar was significantly lower than coplanar (p < 0.001), while IMPT was significantly lower than both photon modalities (p < 0.001). Protons delivered higher doses to the brainstem, optic nerves, chiasm, and the hypothalami. <h3>Conclusions</h3> These findings indicate that IMPT can significantly reduce AEs to critical brain structures. Although considerations of cost, accessibility, and clinical validation remain, IMPT may offer a meaningful therapeutic advantage.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Maastro Clinic (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.