Revising Structuralism in Times of Crisis: Lance Taylor and the Neo‐Structuralist Synthesis in the 1980s

ABSTRACT This article places the work of Lance Taylor in the broader context of efforts in the 1980s to renew the structuralist tradition of development economics, into what was then newly coined as neo‐structuralism. These efforts centred around three groups: CEPAL, Lance Taylor and his team at MIT, and a group of economists based at the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague. The efforts included a strong focus on theoretical modelling, in which Lance Taylor played a leading role, albeit with much tension and debate from within these efforts, especially around whether to accommodate or reject neoclassical microfoundations. Taylor's position was ambiguous in this regard, although he was possibly pushed towards a more explicit heterodox position in the 1990s through the interactions and debates between these three groups in the 1980s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metroeconomica
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.70021
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revising Structuralism in Times of Crisis: Lance Taylor and the Neo‐Structuralist Synthesis in the 1980s

Andrew M. Fischer
Metroeconomica
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Revising Structuralism in Times of Crisis: Lance Taylor and the Neo‐Structuralist Synthesis in the 1980s

Andrew M. Fischer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article places the work of Lance Taylor in the broader context of efforts in the 1980s to renew the structuralist tradition of development economics, into what was then newly coined as neo‐structuralism. These efforts centred around three groups: CEPAL, Lance Taylor and his team at MIT, and a group of economists based at the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague. The efforts included a strong focus on theoretical modelling, in which Lance Taylor played a leading role, albeit with much tension and debate from within these efforts, especially around whether to accommodate or reject neoclassical microfoundations. Taylor's position was ambiguous in this regard, although he was possibly pushed towards a more explicit heterodox position in the 1990s through the interactions and debates between these three groups in the 1980s.

Metroeconomica
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.