Comparison of non-transport disc and conventional distraction osteogenesis for mandibular segmental defect reconstruction

BACKGROUND: An animal model of non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) was developed for repairing segmental mandibular defects in dogs. This study aimed to determine whether any difference exists in osteogenesis within the distraction zone between non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) and conventional distraction osteogenesis (CDO), in order to provide a reference for its clinical application in the repair of segmental mandibular defects. METHODS: Twenty-four dogs were divided into two groups, and animal models of NTDDO and CDO were established respectively.Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4,and 8 weeks of consolidation. The new bone in the distraction zone was observed or detected by gross condition, X-ray film, Micro CT, biomechanical test. The histological manifestation of new bone was observed by HE staining. The expression of the osteoblast marker Runx2, and the endothelial cell marker CD31 were detected by immunohistochemistry and microvessel density was calculated. RESULTS: The results from gross specimens, radiographs, and HE staining indicated no significant differences in new bone formation within the distraction gap between the NTDDO and CDO groups at any time point. Micro-CT analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, or Tb.Sp (P > 0.05). Similarly, biomechanical testing showed no significant difference in maximum load (P > 0.05). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated comparable expression levels of CD31 and Runx2, with no significant difference in neovascular density (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis achieves osteogenic quality equivalent to conventional distraction osteogenesis, with inferior alveolar neurovascular resection posing no adverse effects on bone regeneration. The underlying mechanisms, particularly the potential interplay between nerve regeneration and periosteal contributions, warrant further exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06948-4
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of non-transport disc and conventional distraction osteogenesis for mandibular segmental defect reconstruction

Xiaoxia Zhong, Haiyun Lin, Xuanping Huang, Huijuan Shen et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Comparison of non-transport disc and conventional distraction osteogenesis for mandibular segmental defect reconstruction

Xiaoxia Zhong, Haiyun Lin, Xuanping Huang, Huijuan Shen, Nuo Zhou
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An animal model of non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) was developed for repairing segmental mandibular defects in dogs. This study aimed to determine whether any difference exists in osteogenesis within the distraction zone between non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis (NTDDO) and conventional distraction osteogenesis (CDO), in order to provide a reference for its clinical application in the repair of segmental mandibular defects. METHODS: Twenty-four dogs were divided into two groups, and animal models of NTDDO and CDO were established respectively.Samples were taken at 0, 2, 4,and 8 weeks of consolidation. The new bone in the distraction zone was observed or detected by gross condition, X-ray film, Micro CT, biomechanical test. The histological manifestation of new bone was observed by HE staining. The expression of the osteoblast marker Runx2, and the endothelial cell marker CD31 were detected by immunohistochemistry and microvessel density was calculated. RESULTS: The results from gross specimens, radiographs, and HE staining indicated no significant differences in new bone formation within the distraction gap between the NTDDO and CDO groups at any time point. Micro-CT analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, or Tb.Sp (P > 0.05). Similarly, biomechanical testing showed no significant difference in maximum load (P > 0.05). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated comparable expression levels of CD31 and Runx2, with no significant difference in neovascular density (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Non-transport disc distraction osteogenesis achieves osteogenic quality equivalent to conventional distraction osteogenesis, with inferior alveolar neurovascular resection posing no adverse effects on bone regeneration. The underlying mechanisms, particularly the potential interplay between nerve regeneration and periosteal contributions, warrant further exploration.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Guangxi University (CN), Guangxi Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN)
Guangxi Key Research and Development Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.