Optimising SMS content for bowel cancer screening participation in Australia: cross-sectional national survey findings

OBJECTIVES AND IMPORTANCE OF STUDY: This study aimed to identify short message service (SMS) reminder content perceived as most likely to prompt bowel cancer screening, examine differences across sociodemographic subgroups, and explore preferences for timing and frequency. METHODS: Australian residents (N = 1016) aged 50-74 years completed an online survey rating five SMS reminders presented in random order. Outcomes included perceived usefulness, likelihood of encouraging kit return, likelihood of irritation and clarity. Preferences for timing and frequency were also assessed. Bayesian multilevel modelling (cumulative probit) compared ratings across SMS types, with effect sizes expressed as standard deviation (s.d.) differences in perceived likelihood that each SMS would encourage kit return compared with a reminder-only message. Interactions with age, gender, socioeconomic status and screening history were explored. RESULTS: Compared with a 'reminder-only' message, SMS content that encouraged storing the kit near the toilet (s.d. 0.44), conveyed general practitioner endorsement (s.d. 0.32) and gave instructions (s.d. 0.22) was more likely to prompt kit return. Responses varied slightly by age and area-level socioeconomic status. Most participants preferred two to three SMS reminders (mean 2.89, s.d. 6.73). CONCLUSIONS: SMS reminders using behavioural prompts and clear, concise content may support improved screening participation. Tailored SMS messages that reflect public preferences may increase kit return rates, support national screening goals and reduce bowel cancer mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Research & Practice
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/pu25121
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising SMS content for bowel cancer screening participation in Australia: cross-sectional national survey findings

DA Ouakrim, Kirstie Daken, Belinda C. Goodwin, Nicole Perry et al.
Public Health Research & Practice
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Optimising SMS content for bowel cancer screening participation in Australia: cross-sectional national survey findings

DA Ouakrim, Kirstie Daken, Belinda C. Goodwin, Nicole Perry, Emma Pearse, Michael J. Ireland, Mark Jenkins, Jennifer G. McIntosh, Nancy N. Baxter, Carlene Wilson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND IMPORTANCE OF STUDY: This study aimed to identify short message service (SMS) reminder content perceived as most likely to prompt bowel cancer screening, examine differences across sociodemographic subgroups, and explore preferences for timing and frequency. METHODS: Australian residents (N = 1016) aged 50-74 years completed an online survey rating five SMS reminders presented in random order. Outcomes included perceived usefulness, likelihood of encouraging kit return, likelihood of irritation and clarity. Preferences for timing and frequency were also assessed. Bayesian multilevel modelling (cumulative probit) compared ratings across SMS types, with effect sizes expressed as standard deviation (s.d.) differences in perceived likelihood that each SMS would encourage kit return compared with a reminder-only message. Interactions with age, gender, socioeconomic status and screening history were explored. RESULTS: Compared with a 'reminder-only' message, SMS content that encouraged storing the kit near the toilet (s.d. 0.44), conveyed general practitioner endorsement (s.d. 0.32) and gave instructions (s.d. 0.22) was more likely to prompt kit return. Responses varied slightly by age and area-level socioeconomic status. Most participants preferred two to three SMS reminders (mean 2.89, s.d. 6.73). CONCLUSIONS: SMS reminders using behavioural prompts and clear, concise content may support improved screening participation. Tailored SMS messages that reflect public preferences may increase kit return rates, support national screening goals and reduce bowel cancer mortality.

Public Health Research & PracticeVol. 36(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU), Ludwig Cancer Research (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.