Evaluating Trans‐Fatty Acids Labelling in Packaged Foods Sold in Brazil Before and After National Policy Changes

INTRODUCTION: The elimination of industrial trans-fatty acids (i-TFA) is a global public health priority. In Brazil, food regulatory changes were implemented in 2012, limiting the use of TFA-free claims and in 2019, restricting i-TFA content in food. This study analysed i-TFA declarations on labels of packaged foods sold in Brazil in 2010, 2013 and 2020, before, during and after food policy changes. METHODS: This repeated cross-sectional study analysed labels of packaged foods from an outlet of a large supermarket chain in Brazil (n = 2327 products in 2010; n = 3176 in 2013, n = 4397 in 2020). The i-TFA terms listed in the ingredient list, content of trans-fatty acids (TFA) declared on nutrition information panels (NIPs), and TFA-free claims were examined. Descriptive and comparative analysis over time were conducted using binary and multinomial logistic regressions. RESULTS: The percentage of foods containing potential i-TFA ingredients was 50.6% in 2010, 36.4% in 2013 and 28.5% in 2020. Overall, the likelihood that NIPs declared TFA decreased over time (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.40; 0.53, p < 0.001), but this was not consistent across all food groups and years. The likelihood of using TFA-free claims also decreased (OR: 0.12; 95%CI: 0.10; 0.15, p < 0.001) over time. However, in 2020, 24.1% of foods labelled as containing 0 g TFA in their NIPs still listed ingredients that could be sources of i-TFA. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to analyse TFA labelling in Brazil, informing regulatory discussions and offering a basis for assessing compliance with TFA-focused labelling regulations. Our findings suggest that the 2019 regulation on i-TFA restrictions contributed to amplifying and sustaining the impact of the 2012 labelling regulations in reducing i-TFA packaged food sold at the retail level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70253
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Trans‐Fatty Acids Labelling in Packaged Foods Sold in Brazil Before and After National Policy Changes

Maria Cecília Cury Chaddad, Greyce Luci Bernardo, Beatriz Vasconcellos de Barros, Ana Carolina Fernandes et al.
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Evaluating Trans‐Fatty Acids Labelling in Packaged Foods Sold in Brazil Before and After National Policy Changes

Maria Cecília Cury Chaddad, Greyce Luci Bernardo, Beatriz Vasconcellos de Barros, Ana Carolina Fernandes, Elisa Milano, Paula Lazzarin Uggioni, Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença, Mariana Vieira dos Santos Kraemer, Tailane Scapin, Lana Vanderlee
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The elimination of industrial trans-fatty acids (i-TFA) is a global public health priority. In Brazil, food regulatory changes were implemented in 2012, limiting the use of TFA-free claims and in 2019, restricting i-TFA content in food. This study analysed i-TFA declarations on labels of packaged foods sold in Brazil in 2010, 2013 and 2020, before, during and after food policy changes. METHODS: This repeated cross-sectional study analysed labels of packaged foods from an outlet of a large supermarket chain in Brazil (n = 2327 products in 2010; n = 3176 in 2013, n = 4397 in 2020). The i-TFA terms listed in the ingredient list, content of trans-fatty acids (TFA) declared on nutrition information panels (NIPs), and TFA-free claims were examined. Descriptive and comparative analysis over time were conducted using binary and multinomial logistic regressions. RESULTS: The percentage of foods containing potential i-TFA ingredients was 50.6% in 2010, 36.4% in 2013 and 28.5% in 2020. Overall, the likelihood that NIPs declared TFA decreased over time (OR: 0.46; 95%CI: 0.40; 0.53, p < 0.001), but this was not consistent across all food groups and years. The likelihood of using TFA-free claims also decreased (OR: 0.12; 95%CI: 0.10; 0.15, p < 0.001) over time. However, in 2020, 24.1% of foods labelled as containing 0 g TFA in their NIPs still listed ingredients that could be sources of i-TFA. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to analyse TFA labelling in Brazil, informing regulatory discussions and offering a basis for assessing compliance with TFA-focused labelling regulations. Our findings suggest that the 2019 regulation on i-TFA restrictions contributed to amplifying and sustaining the impact of the 2012 labelling regulations in reducing i-TFA packaged food sold at the retail level.

Journal of Human Nutrition and DieteticsVol. 39(3)
Deakin University (AU), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Nutrition & Santé (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.