Improved organs-of-interest dose reduction potential with intensity modulated proton therapy and breath-hold in mediastinal lymphoma

Background and PurposeFor mediastinal lymphoma patients, comparative data on intensity modulated proton therapy in breath-hold (IMPT-BH) versus other radiation techniques remain limited, particularly regarding dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for late side effects. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective in silico planning study included 58 lymphoma patients, treated between 2019 and May 2024, having 4D-CT and BH-CT available.Four plans per patient were made: volumetric arc therapy in free-breathing (VMAT-FB), VMAT-BH, IMPT-FB, and IMPT-BH.An absolute dose difference 1 Gy was considered clinically relevant, and patients were assigned to the optimal technique. ResultsIMPT-BH resulted in the lowest average mean heart dose (MHD) at 5.4 Gy (p<0.01)compared to VMAT-FB (8.0 Gy), VMAT-BH (6.3 Gy) and IMPT-FB (5.8 Gy).IMPT-BH resulted in the lowest average mean lung dose (MLD) at 6.7 Gy (p<0.05),compared to VMAT-FB (9.2 Gy), VMAT-BH (7.5 Gy), and IMPT-FB (7.3 Gy).Average bilateral mean breast dose (MBD) was lower with IMPT (2.1 Gy) compared to VMAT (3.2 Gy; p<0.05).IMPT was optimal for 69% of patients. ConclusionsIMPT-BH achieved the lowest MHD, MLD, and bilateral MBD compared to IMPT-FB, VMAT-BH, and VMAT-FB in the majority of patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100996
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved organs-of-interest dose reduction potential with intensity modulated proton therapy and breath-hold in mediastinal lymphoma

Maud Cobben, Richard Canters, Indra Lubken, Kim van der Klugt et al.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Improved organs-of-interest dose reduction potential with intensity modulated proton therapy and breath-hold in mediastinal lymphoma

Maud Cobben, Richard Canters, Indra Lubken, Kim van der Klugt, Bastiaan D.P. Ta, Anne G.H. Niezink, Fleur Vereijken, T. Verstappen, Cissy Stultiens, Gyanne Tholen, Maaike Berbée, Marije Velders, Maud van den Bosch, Esther Kneepkens, Gloria Vilches-Freixas, Dirk K.M. De Ruysscher
article en

Abstract

Background and PurposeFor mediastinal lymphoma patients, comparative data on intensity modulated proton therapy in breath-hold (IMPT-BH) versus other radiation techniques remain limited, particularly regarding dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for late side effects. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective in silico planning study included 58 lymphoma patients, treated between 2019 and May 2024, having 4D-CT and BH-CT available.Four plans per patient were made: volumetric arc therapy in free-breathing (VMAT-FB), VMAT-BH, IMPT-FB, and IMPT-BH.An absolute dose difference 1 Gy was considered clinically relevant, and patients were assigned to the optimal technique. ResultsIMPT-BH resulted in the lowest average mean heart dose (MHD) at 5.4 Gy (p<0.01)compared to VMAT-FB (8.0 Gy), VMAT-BH (6.3 Gy) and IMPT-FB (5.8 Gy).IMPT-BH resulted in the lowest average mean lung dose (MLD) at 6.7 Gy (p<0.05),compared to VMAT-FB (9.2 Gy), VMAT-BH (7.5 Gy), and IMPT-FB (7.3 Gy).Average bilateral mean breast dose (MBD) was lower with IMPT (2.1 Gy) compared to VMAT (3.2 Gy; p<0.05).IMPT was optimal for 69% of patients. ConclusionsIMPT-BH achieved the lowest MHD, MLD, and bilateral MBD compared to IMPT-FB, VMAT-BH, and VMAT-FB in the majority of patients.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Maastro Clinic (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.