Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in high density cities: Revealing nonlinear driving mechanisms through machine learning

Metropolises are confronted with ecosystem degradation driven by rapid urbanization and continuously intensified human activities, posing significant challenges to human well-being and urban sustainable development. Identifying the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) and their underlying driving mechanisms forms the foundation for implementing effective ecological management strategies. Taking the central urban areas of Chongqing as a case study, we integrated Spearman correlation analysis, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Self-Organizing Map (SOM), and XGBoost-SHAP methods to analyze the interrelationships and driving mechanisms of five typical ESs habitat quality (HQ), soil retention (SR), food production (FP), net primary productivity (NPP), and water yield (WY). The results revealed that: (1) (HQ), (SR), (FP), and (NPP) predominantly exhibited synergistic relationships, while trade-offs were commonly observed with (WY), especially in HQ–WY; (2) The GWR model indicated that spatial nonstationarity relationships occur in different ESs and were closely associated with urbanization levels; (3) Vegetation have dominant impact on ESs relationships, with vegetation canopy height (VCH) demonstrating the strongest positive impact on ESs, while the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) exhibited an inhibitory effect on HQ characterized by a distinct threshold; (4) Ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) were identified through SOM and we subsequently classified the study area into five types of zones: urban development zone, ecological buffer zone, core ecological zone, agricultural potential zone, and ecological conservation zone. Finally, corresponding ecological management and control strategies were proposed for different zones to harmonize urbanization with ecological protection in high density city. • Urbanization and land-use competition shape ES trade-offs, synergies, and spatial heterogeneity in high-density cities. • Interpretable machine learning reveals nonlinear ES responses and key socio-ecological thresholds. • Vegetation structure dominates ES dynamics, with canopy height exerting the strongest influence. • A multi-dimensional diagnosis framework couples ES bundles with threshold analysis for high-density urban contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129879
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in high density cities: Revealing nonlinear driving mechanisms through machine learning

Chen BenWen, Tingwen Fang, Tianji Wu, Hexiong Shi et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in high density cities: Revealing nonlinear driving mechanisms through machine learning

Chen BenWen, Tingwen Fang, Tianji Wu, Hexiong Shi, Li Wu, Wenjie Jiang, Zuying Liu, Leyuan Zhong, Yingzan Xie, Shiyou Huang
article en

Abstract

Metropolises are confronted with ecosystem degradation driven by rapid urbanization and continuously intensified human activities, posing significant challenges to human well-being and urban sustainable development. Identifying the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services (ESs) and their underlying driving mechanisms forms the foundation for implementing effective ecological management strategies. Taking the central urban areas of Chongqing as a case study, we integrated Spearman correlation analysis, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), Self-Organizing Map (SOM), and XGBoost-SHAP methods to analyze the interrelationships and driving mechanisms of five typical ESs habitat quality (HQ), soil retention (SR), food production (FP), net primary productivity (NPP), and water yield (WY). The results revealed that: (1) (HQ), (SR), (FP), and (NPP) predominantly exhibited synergistic relationships, while trade-offs were commonly observed with (WY), especially in HQ–WY; (2) The GWR model indicated that spatial nonstationarity relationships occur in different ESs and were closely associated with urbanization levels; (3) Vegetation have dominant impact on ESs relationships, with vegetation canopy height (VCH) demonstrating the strongest positive impact on ESs, while the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) exhibited an inhibitory effect on HQ characterized by a distinct threshold; (4) Ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) were identified through SOM and we subsequently classified the study area into five types of zones: urban development zone, ecological buffer zone, core ecological zone, agricultural potential zone, and ecological conservation zone. Finally, corresponding ecological management and control strategies were proposed for different zones to harmonize urbanization with ecological protection in high density city. • Urbanization and land-use competition shape ES trade-offs, synergies, and spatial heterogeneity in high-density cities. • Interpretable machine learning reveals nonlinear ES responses and key socio-ecological thresholds. • Vegetation structure dominates ES dynamics, with canopy height exerting the strongest influence. • A multi-dimensional diagnosis framework couples ES bundles with threshold analysis for high-density urban contexts.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 407
North West Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Chongqing Academy of Forestry (CN), Wenzhou-Kean University (CN), East China Normal University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Chongqing Science and Technology Commission, Key Technologies Research and Development Program
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.