Contextual Predictability Modulates Neural Processing of Social Threat Words in High and Low Social Anxiety: Evidence from ERPs and Theta Oscillations

Haichen Wang,* Zhengjun Wang,* Xiuxiu Zhang, Mutian Guo, Yaxi Duan, Qiusha Luo, Zhen Bi, Yue Du, Jianqin Cao Key Laboratory of Basic Research and Health Management on Chronic Diseases in Heilongjiang Province, Daqing Campus, Harbin Medical University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, 163319, People’s Republic of China*These authors made equal contributions to this workCorrespondence: Jianqin Cao, Daqing Campus, Harbin Medical University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Individuals with high social anxiety (HSA) consistently exhibit attentional biases toward social threat. However, most evidence derives from paradigms in which threat and neutral stimuli are unpredictably intermixed, leaving it unclear whether such biases reflect heightened sensitivity to threat content per se or increased sensitivity to contextual unpredictability, where emotional valence changes unpredictably across trials.Methods: HSA and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals completed an emotional Stroop task comprising a mixed context, in which threat and neutral words were randomly presented, and a threat-only context, in which threat was fully predictable Behavioral responses, event-related potentials (P2, EPN, LPP), and theta-band oscillations were analyzed.Results: Behaviorally, HSA participants responded more slowly than LSA participants in the mixed context but faster in the threat-only context. At the neural level, early perceptual processing indexed by P2 did not differ reliably across groups. In contrast, EPN amplitudes were selectively enhanced in HSA individuals under predictable threat, whereas LSA individuals showed increased LPP amplitudes reflecting sustained evaluative engagement. Frontal theta power was greater in LSA than HSA individuals in the mixed context.Conclusion: These findings suggest that threat-related bias in HSA participants is associated with contextual predictability, in addition to threat exposure. HSA is characterized by intact or heightened early sensitivity to threat alongside context-dependent differences in later evaluative and regulatory processes. By highlighting the role of contextual predictability and temporal dynamics, the present study provides a more nuanced understanding of emotional dysregulation in high social anxiety.Keywords: social anxiety, emotional Stroop task, context predictability, event-related potentials, theta oscillations

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Published
2026-05-01
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual Predictability Modulates Neural Processing of Social Threat Words in High and Low Social Anxiety: Evidence from ERPs and Theta Oscillations

Cao J, Du Y, Duan Y, Bi Z et al.
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Contextual Predictability Modulates Neural Processing of Social Threat Words in High and Low Social Anxiety: Evidence from ERPs and Theta Oscillations

Cao J, Du Y, Duan Y, Bi Z, Zhang X, Z X Wang, Luo Q, Wang H, Guo M
article en

Abstract

Haichen Wang,* Zhengjun Wang,* Xiuxiu Zhang, Mutian Guo, Yaxi Duan, Qiusha Luo, Zhen Bi, Yue Du, Jianqin Cao Key Laboratory of Basic Research and Health Management on Chronic Diseases in Heilongjiang Province, Daqing Campus, Harbin Medical University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, 163319, People’s Republic of China*These authors made equal contributions to this workCorrespondence: Jianqin Cao, Daqing Campus, Harbin Medical University, Daqing, Heilongjiang, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Individuals with high social anxiety (HSA) consistently exhibit attentional biases toward social threat. However, most evidence derives from paradigms in which threat and neutral stimuli are unpredictably intermixed, leaving it unclear whether such biases reflect heightened sensitivity to threat content per se or increased sensitivity to contextual unpredictability, where emotional valence changes unpredictably across trials.Methods: HSA and low social anxiety (LSA) individuals completed an emotional Stroop task comprising a mixed context, in which threat and neutral words were randomly presented, and a threat-only context, in which threat was fully predictable Behavioral responses, event-related potentials (P2, EPN, LPP), and theta-band oscillations were analyzed.Results: Behaviorally, HSA participants responded more slowly than LSA participants in the mixed context but faster in the threat-only context. At the neural level, early perceptual processing indexed by P2 did not differ reliably across groups. In contrast, EPN amplitudes were selectively enhanced in HSA individuals under predictable threat, whereas LSA individuals showed increased LPP amplitudes reflecting sustained evaluative engagement. Frontal theta power was greater in LSA than HSA individuals in the mixed context.Conclusion: These findings suggest that threat-related bias in HSA participants is associated with contextual predictability, in addition to threat exposure. HSA is characterized by intact or heightened early sensitivity to threat alongside context-dependent differences in later evaluative and regulatory processes. By highlighting the role of contextual predictability and temporal dynamics, the present study provides a more nuanced understanding of emotional dysregulation in high social anxiety.Keywords: social anxiety, emotional Stroop task, context predictability, event-related potentials, theta oscillations

DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Daqing Normal University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.