Corporate War Profiteering and International Law

This book re-centres corporate war profiteering in the analysis of contemporary warfare, interrogating international law’s role in sustaining this dynamic. Despite the intuitive centrality of profit to war, its urgency remains strikingly absent from legal discourse, a suspicious disinterest this work challenges head-on. It contends that international law serves dually as a coercive tool enabling profiteering and a deceptive veil obscuring it. This functionality stems from law’s systematic detachment from the reality of asymmetrical, tech-driven warfare in places like the DRC, Sudan, Palestine, Ukraine, and Myanmar. Such detachment persists via weak theoretical presumptions, reinforced by cognitive and disciplinary biases toward individualism, public/private divide and fragmentation. Through incisive alternative readings, the book unmasks power-laden manipulations of legal authority, offering a vital corrective for scholars of law, war economies, and critical theory.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2026-04-10
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate War Profiteering and International Law

Shahd Hammouri
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Corporate War Profiteering and International Law

Shahd Hammouri
article en

Abstract

This book re-centres corporate war profiteering in the analysis of contemporary warfare, interrogating international law’s role in sustaining this dynamic. Despite the intuitive centrality of profit to war, its urgency remains strikingly absent from legal discourse, a suspicious disinterest this work challenges head-on. It contends that international law serves dually as a coercive tool enabling profiteering and a deceptive veil obscuring it. This functionality stems from law’s systematic detachment from the reality of asymmetrical, tech-driven warfare in places like the DRC, Sudan, Palestine, Ukraine, and Myanmar. Such detachment persists via weak theoretical presumptions, reinforced by cognitive and disciplinary biases toward individualism, public/private divide and fragmentation. Through incisive alternative readings, the book unmasks power-laden manipulations of legal authority, offering a vital corrective for scholars of law, war economies, and critical theory.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.