Stories of labyrinths: Umberto Eco’s semiotics in <i>The Name of the Rose</i>

Abstract This paper interrogates Umberto Eco’s conceptualization of labyrinths in The Name of the Rose by deploying his distinctions among the classic labyrinth, the maze (or Irrweg), and the rhizome. It demonstrates that the novel operates on three intertwined narrative levels: the plot, the reader’s experience, and the intertextual construction of the text. By mapping the archetypes of the naïve and critical readers onto the structural ambiguities of the library labyrinth, the analysis contends that Eco constructs a multifaceted semiotic network that foregrounds the inherent undecidability of meaning. Through close readings of key passages and a critical engagement with secondary literature, the study reveals how the labyrinthine model disrupts conventional narrative closure and opens up infinite possibilities for signification. Ultimately, this multilayered interpretation positions The Name of the Rose as a metatext that both embodies and critiques the processes of reading and interpretation, thereby advancing Eco scholarship and contributing to broader debates in semiotics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semiotica
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2025-0034
Primary Topic
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stories of labyrinths: Umberto Eco’s semiotics in The Name of the Rose

Nino Liam Töndury
Semiotica
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
article

Stories of labyrinths: Umberto Eco’s semiotics in The Name of the Rose

Nino Liam Töndury
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper interrogates Umberto Eco’s conceptualization of labyrinths in The Name of the Rose by deploying his distinctions among the classic labyrinth, the maze (or Irrweg), and the rhizome. It demonstrates that the novel operates on three intertwined narrative levels: the plot, the reader’s experience, and the intertextual construction of the text. By mapping the archetypes of the naïve and critical readers onto the structural ambiguities of the library labyrinth, the analysis contends that Eco constructs a multifaceted semiotic network that foregrounds the inherent undecidability of meaning. Through close readings of key passages and a critical engagement with secondary literature, the study reveals how the labyrinthine model disrupts conventional narrative closure and opens up infinite possibilities for signification. Ultimately, this multilayered interpretation positions The Name of the Rose as a metatext that both embodies and critiques the processes of reading and interpretation, thereby advancing Eco scholarship and contributing to broader debates in semiotics.

Semiotica
University of Fribourg (CH), Fribourg Development Agency (CH), HES-SO Fribourg (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Umberto Eco and Semiotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stories of labyrinths: Umberto Eco’s semiotics in <i>The Name of the Rose</i> — Nino Liam Töndury · Semiotica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS