Can ChatGPT Take My Call? evaluating AI in gynecologic oncology telephone triage

• ChatGPT matched fellow’s triage decisions for most patient calls. • When AI management differed, it favored patient safety with conservative over-triage. • Physicians rated AI-generated responses as highly accurate, clear, and useful. As access to artificial intelligence (AI) expands, patients and clinicians increasingly rely on these platforms for medical information and guidance. This study assessed ChatGPT’s ability to triage and respond to gynecologic oncology (GO) patient telephone calls. In this cross-sectional study, 30 patient scenarios received by on-call GO fellows were evaluated using ChatGPT-4o. Four physicians independently rated responses for accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, relevance, and applicability using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor; 5 = very good) and assessed the presence of misinformation (yes/no). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared mean ratings with a predefined threshold of 3.0 (“acceptable”), with significance set at p < 0.05. The prevalence of misinformation was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Agreement with provider recommendations was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. Misclassification patterns (over-triage vs under-triage) were summarized. Among 30 scenarios, exact agreement between AI and fellows occurred in 26 cases (86.7%). Misinformation was identified in 4 responses (3.3%; 95% CI, 0.6–16.7%). Misclassifications included three cases (10.0%) over-triaged to clinic within one week and one case (3.3%) under-triaged to stay home rather than be seen within one week. In all 10 scenarios where the fellows’ recommended emergency department evaluation, AI issued the same recommendation. Agreement between AI and fellow triage decisions was high (κ = 0.87). Across all categories, physician ratings of AI responses significantly exceeded the acceptable threshold (p < 0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated high reliability in triaging and responding to GO patient telephone calls, producing clear, accurate, and clinically appropriate guidance. Its consistent performance in urgent scenarios and tendency toward conservative triage suggest that AI may serve as a valuable adjunct to support on-call personnel and enhance after-hours triage workflows in GO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102101
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ChatGPT Take My Call? evaluating AI in gynecologic oncology telephone triage

Andrew Vallejo, Sharonne Holtzman, Aashna Saini, Ann Marie Mercier et al.
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Can ChatGPT Take My Call? evaluating AI in gynecologic oncology telephone triage

Andrew Vallejo, Sharonne Holtzman, Aashna Saini, Ann Marie Mercier, Lisa Mordell, Kristen Zeligs, Stephanie Williams, Caitlin Carr, Stephanie V. Blank
article en

Abstract

• ChatGPT matched fellow’s triage decisions for most patient calls. • When AI management differed, it favored patient safety with conservative over-triage. • Physicians rated AI-generated responses as highly accurate, clear, and useful. As access to artificial intelligence (AI) expands, patients and clinicians increasingly rely on these platforms for medical information and guidance. This study assessed ChatGPT’s ability to triage and respond to gynecologic oncology (GO) patient telephone calls. In this cross-sectional study, 30 patient scenarios received by on-call GO fellows were evaluated using ChatGPT-4o. Four physicians independently rated responses for accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, relevance, and applicability using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor; 5 = very good) and assessed the presence of misinformation (yes/no). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared mean ratings with a predefined threshold of 3.0 (“acceptable”), with significance set at p < 0.05. The prevalence of misinformation was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Agreement with provider recommendations was assessed using Cohen’s kappa. Misclassification patterns (over-triage vs under-triage) were summarized. Among 30 scenarios, exact agreement between AI and fellows occurred in 26 cases (86.7%). Misinformation was identified in 4 responses (3.3%; 95% CI, 0.6–16.7%). Misclassifications included three cases (10.0%) over-triaged to clinic within one week and one case (3.3%) under-triaged to stay home rather than be seen within one week. In all 10 scenarios where the fellows’ recommended emergency department evaluation, AI issued the same recommendation. Agreement between AI and fellow triage decisions was high (κ = 0.87). Across all categories, physician ratings of AI responses significantly exceeded the acceptable threshold (p < 0.001). ChatGPT demonstrated high reliability in triaging and responding to GO patient telephone calls, producing clear, accurate, and clinically appropriate guidance. Its consistent performance in urgent scenarios and tendency toward conservative triage suggest that AI may serve as a valuable adjunct to support on-call personnel and enhance after-hours triage workflows in GO.

Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.