Use of Artificial Intelligence in prostate MRI: A rapid scoping review highlighting limited evidence in screening context

Background and Objective: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is seen as a potential solution to alleviate workforce demands arising from growing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) screening.We aimed to synthesize the evidence on use of AI in prostate MRI readings in asymptomatic men in PCa screening settings. Methods:We conducted a rapid scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Cochrane rapid review methods performing the systematic search of major databases supplemented by grey literature search with no restrictions in study design and time-duration.We considered various aspects of utilization of AI in MRI interpretations and biopsy indications in the screening setting.Anticipating limited evidence on AI implementation in screening settings, we extended the review from 'what is known' to discussion on 'key considerations for expected expansion'. Key findings and limitations:We identified 284 records with 47 studies assessed for eligibility and two studied met the inclusion criteria.Both evaluated commercially available ProstateAI software tool to interpret prostate MRI.Agreement between deep learning-based algorithm of AI and expert radiologist ranged from poor to moderate (kappa 0.17-0.42).AI demonstrated high tendency of over-detection and low specificity, leading to discordance with expert radiologists. Conclusions and clinical implications:Current evidence on use of AI in prostate MRI interpretation is limited, but this review highlights several important directions for future research and implementation.Generating robust evidence base in the coming years will be crucial to ensure that AI integration enhances the effectiveness and acceptability of future prostate cancer screening programs. Patient summary:In this study, we examined whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools can accurately read prostate MRI scans of apparently healthy men for early detection of prostate cancer.We found that deploying current AI tools that are trained and tested in hospital referred patients may not be optimal to read MRI performed in asymptomatic men.We conclude that AI needs much more training and testing in real screening populations before it can be safely used in prostate cancer screening programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112930
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence in prostate MRI: A rapid scoping review highlighting limited evidence in screening context

Sarah Collen, Olivier Rouvière, Milagros Otero-García, Lionne D. F. Venderbos et al.
European Journal of Radiology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Use of Artificial Intelligence in prostate MRI: A rapid scoping review highlighting limited evidence in screening context

Sarah Collen, Olivier Rouvière, Milagros Otero-García, Lionne D. F. Venderbos, Deependra Singh, Arunah Chandran, Partha Basu, Francesco Giganti, Hendrik van Poppel, Monique J. Roobol, Juan Pablo Salazar Gutiérrez, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh
article en

Abstract

Background and Objective: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is seen as a potential solution to alleviate workforce demands arising from growing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) screening.We aimed to synthesize the evidence on use of AI in prostate MRI readings in asymptomatic men in PCa screening settings. Methods:We conducted a rapid scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Cochrane rapid review methods performing the systematic search of major databases supplemented by grey literature search with no restrictions in study design and time-duration.We considered various aspects of utilization of AI in MRI interpretations and biopsy indications in the screening setting.Anticipating limited evidence on AI implementation in screening settings, we extended the review from 'what is known' to discussion on 'key considerations for expected expansion'. Key findings and limitations:We identified 284 records with 47 studies assessed for eligibility and two studied met the inclusion criteria.Both evaluated commercially available ProstateAI software tool to interpret prostate MRI.Agreement between deep learning-based algorithm of AI and expert radiologist ranged from poor to moderate (kappa 0.17-0.42).AI demonstrated high tendency of over-detection and low specificity, leading to discordance with expert radiologists. Conclusions and clinical implications:Current evidence on use of AI in prostate MRI interpretation is limited, but this review highlights several important directions for future research and implementation.Generating robust evidence base in the coming years will be crucial to ensure that AI integration enhances the effectiveness and acceptability of future prostate cancer screening programs. Patient summary:In this study, we examined whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools can accurately read prostate MRI scans of apparently healthy men for early detection of prostate cancer.We found that deploying current AI tools that are trained and tested in hospital referred patients may not be optimal to read MRI performed in asymptomatic men.We conclude that AI needs much more training and testing in real screening populations before it can be safely used in prostate cancer screening programs.

European Journal of Radiology
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), European Association of Urology (NL), University Hospital Complex Of Vigo (ES), Althaia (ES), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Edouard Herriot (FR), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR), University College London (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
FP7 Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.