SΔϕ-63 — Theory-to-Module Conversion Protocol: Converting Philosophical, Ethical, and Religious Frameworks into Conditional Detection Modules

This working paper introduces the Theory-to-Module Conversion Protocol within the Sofience–Δϕ (SΔϕ) Formalism. The core declaration is: no theory should be used as a final judge. Every theory should be converted into a conditional detection module before use. The protocol provides an AI-readable method for transforming philosophical, ethical, religious, political, and epistemic frameworks into operational modules. Instead of treating Kantianism, utilitarianism, Marxism, Buddhism, Foucauldian analysis, liberalism, phenomenology, or other traditions as complete worldviews or final adjudicators, the protocol asks what each theory detects well, what it tries to measure, what it makes visible, what it leaves as UMR, what MIC arises from applying it, what costs it may externalize, what strong world-bound claims it tends to make, and what RVP is required. The central conversion formula is: Theory_X → Detection Module_X + UMR_X + MIC_X + CER_X + RVP_X where UMR means Unmeasured Remainder, MIC means Measurement-Induced Cost, CER means Cost Externalization Risk, and RVP means Revision Path. The document includes a general conversion template and worked examples for Kantianism, utilitarianism, Marxism, and Buddhism. In the SΔϕ conversion, Kantianism becomes a non-instrumentalization filter, utilitarianism becomes an outcome comparison engine, Marxism becomes a structural cost-externalization detector, and Buddhism becomes a suffering-and-attachment detector. These conversions are not reductions. A theory is converted for operational use, not exhausted by the conversion. This protocol is intended for AI-mediated philosophical dialogue, AI ethics, AI alignment, comparative philosophy, theory translation, religious studies, political theory, epistemology, cost-attribution analysis, UMR preservation, MIC detection, RVP design, and low-cost AI use of complex theoretical frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20100647
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
172.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SΔϕ-63 — Theory-to-Module Conversion Protocol: Converting Philosophical, Ethical, and Religious Frameworks into Conditional Detection Modules

Sofience
11 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
172.94
article

SΔϕ-63 — Theory-to-Module Conversion Protocol: Converting Philosophical, Ethical, and Religious Frameworks into Conditional Detection Modules

Sofience
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This working paper introduces the Theory-to-Module Conversion Protocol within the Sofience–Δϕ (SΔϕ) Formalism. The core declaration is: no theory should be used as a final judge. Every theory should be converted into a conditional detection module before use. The protocol provides an AI-readable method for transforming philosophical, ethical, religious, political, and epistemic frameworks into operational modules. Instead of treating Kantianism, utilitarianism, Marxism, Buddhism, Foucauldian analysis, liberalism, phenomenology, or other traditions as complete worldviews or final adjudicators, the protocol asks what each theory detects well, what it tries to measure, what it makes visible, what it leaves as UMR, what MIC arises from applying it, what costs it may externalize, what strong world-bound claims it tends to make, and what RVP is required. The central conversion formula is: Theory_X → Detection Module_X + UMR_X + MIC_X + CER_X + RVP_X where UMR means Unmeasured Remainder, MIC means Measurement-Induced Cost, CER means Cost Externalization Risk, and RVP means Revision Path. The document includes a general conversion template and worked examples for Kantianism, utilitarianism, Marxism, and Buddhism. In the SΔϕ conversion, Kantianism becomes a non-instrumentalization filter, utilitarianism becomes an outcome comparison engine, Marxism becomes a structural cost-externalization detector, and Buddhism becomes a suffering-and-attachment detector. These conversions are not reductions. A theory is converted for operational use, not exhausted by the conversion. This protocol is intended for AI-mediated philosophical dialogue, AI ethics, AI alignment, comparative philosophy, theory translation, religious studies, political theory, epistemology, cost-attribution analysis, UMR preservation, MIC detection, RVP design, and low-cost AI use of complex theoretical frameworks.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
172.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.