Brief Report: Are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Apprehensions a Reliable Proxy for Undocumented Migration? New Evidence on Migration from Guatemala

Researchers have long relied on United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) apprehension data as a proxy for undocumented migration, yet the last time their validity was assessed was in 1995. Significant changes in the composition of migrants and border crossings since then raise questions about their continued validity. In this study, I provide an updated analysis using two independent data sources: the 2018 Guatemalan Census and annual estimates of undocumented Guatemalan arrivals to the United States from the Center for Migration Studies (CMS). Descriptive and regression analyses reveal a strong alignment between apprehensions, household migrations reported in the census, and estimated undocumented entries, suggesting that CBP apprehension data remained a reliable indicator of undocumented migration trends at both national and subnational levels during this period. These findings underscore the continued relevance of apprehensions and the need for regular empirical updates as migration dynamics evolve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Research and Policy Review
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-026-10012-8
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brief Report: Are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Apprehensions a Reliable Proxy for Undocumented Migration? New Evidence on Migration from Guatemala

Matthew Blanton
Population Research and Policy Review
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Brief Report: Are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Apprehensions a Reliable Proxy for Undocumented Migration? New Evidence on Migration from Guatemala

Matthew Blanton
article en

Abstract

Researchers have long relied on United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) apprehension data as a proxy for undocumented migration, yet the last time their validity was assessed was in 1995. Significant changes in the composition of migrants and border crossings since then raise questions about their continued validity. In this study, I provide an updated analysis using two independent data sources: the 2018 Guatemalan Census and annual estimates of undocumented Guatemalan arrivals to the United States from the Center for Migration Studies (CMS). Descriptive and regression analyses reveal a strong alignment between apprehensions, household migrations reported in the census, and estimated undocumented entries, suggesting that CBP apprehension data remained a reliable indicator of undocumented migration trends at both national and subnational levels during this period. These findings underscore the continued relevance of apprehensions and the need for regular empirical updates as migration dynamics evolve.

Population Research and Policy ReviewVol. 45(3)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Brief Report: Are Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Apprehensions a Reliable Proxy for Undocumented Migration? New Evidence on Migration from Guatemala — Matthew Blanton · Population Research and Policy Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS