Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields

Binocular summation enhances visual performance. This enhancement may be disrupted in visual conditions that introduce interocular asymmetries, e.g., glaucoma. Reaction times provide a direct index of visual processing efficiency. However, they have not been studied systematically under binocular conditions in glaucoma. This investigation quantified monocular and binocular saccadic reaction times (RTs) across the visual field using eye-movement perimetry (EMP), compared binocular summation between healthy and glaucoma participants and evaluated correspondence with computational models. Saccadic RTs were measured monocularly/binocularly at 54/56 visual-field locations in seven healthy participants and eight participants with glaucoma of varying severity. Each location was tested with six to ten repetitions under low (74%) and high (155%) contrast conditions. Data were analysed using reciprobit plots, estimation statistics and linear mixed-effects modelling. Binocular RTs were compared with statistical facilitation (Race model) and variance-weighted neural integration predictions. Healthy participants consistently demonstrated a binocular advantage, with RTs faster by ~20 ms relative to monocular viewing, closely matching statistical facilitation predictions. Glaucoma participants showed greater heterogeneity, ranging from preserved summation (~40 ms faster than monocular) to binocular RT being slower than the fastest monocular RT. Computational modelling indicated that most glaucoma cases were compatible with statistical facilitation, but some exhibited deviations suggestive of inhibitory interactions, monocular dominance or faster responses than predicted by statistical facilitation. Binocular RTs provide a sensitive index of visual processing and reveal heterogeneous binocular summation mechanisms in glaucoma. EMP under binocular conditions offers a promising approach for studying functional visual impairment beyond traditional monocular testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00100-9
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields

Peter Bremen, Johan JM Pel, Ronnie George, Ashwini Venkat Reddy Chanakya
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields

Peter Bremen, Johan JM Pel, Ronnie George, Ashwini Venkat Reddy Chanakya
article en

Abstract

Binocular summation enhances visual performance. This enhancement may be disrupted in visual conditions that introduce interocular asymmetries, e.g., glaucoma. Reaction times provide a direct index of visual processing efficiency. However, they have not been studied systematically under binocular conditions in glaucoma. This investigation quantified monocular and binocular saccadic reaction times (RTs) across the visual field using eye-movement perimetry (EMP), compared binocular summation between healthy and glaucoma participants and evaluated correspondence with computational models. Saccadic RTs were measured monocularly/binocularly at 54/56 visual-field locations in seven healthy participants and eight participants with glaucoma of varying severity. Each location was tested with six to ten repetitions under low (74%) and high (155%) contrast conditions. Data were analysed using reciprobit plots, estimation statistics and linear mixed-effects modelling. Binocular RTs were compared with statistical facilitation (Race model) and variance-weighted neural integration predictions. Healthy participants consistently demonstrated a binocular advantage, with RTs faster by ~20 ms relative to monocular viewing, closely matching statistical facilitation predictions. Glaucoma participants showed greater heterogeneity, ranging from preserved summation (~40 ms faster than monocular) to binocular RT being slower than the fastest monocular RT. Computational modelling indicated that most glaucoma cases were compatible with statistical facilitation, but some exhibited deviations suggestive of inhibitory interactions, monocular dominance or faster responses than predicted by statistical facilitation. Binocular RTs provide a sensitive index of visual processing and reveal heterogeneous binocular summation mechanisms in glaucoma. EMP under binocular conditions offers a promising approach for studying functional visual impairment beyond traditional monocular testing.

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Sankara Nethralaya (IN), Erasmus MC (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Oogfonds, Stichting Lijf en Leven, Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.