Multi-Platform In Silico Assessment of Selected A-Series (Novichok) Nerve Agents: Physicochemical, Toxicological, and Mechanistic Insights

A multi-platform in silico framework was developed to characterize five selected A-series (Novichok) nerve agents—A-230, A-232, and A-234 (each evaluated using Ellison- and Mirzayanov-type structural representations) [1,2] together with A-242 and A-262—through integrated physicochemical, toxicological, and biological-activity prediction. Four complementary computational platforms (ACD/Labs Percepta, OECD QSAR Toolbox, EPA T.E.S.T., and PASS Online) were combined within a reproducible workflow to support Structure–Property–Toxicity Relationship (SPTR) interpretation across eight modeled structures (n = 8). Predicted partitioning behavior indicated moderate lipophilicity (logP (GALAS) ≈ 0.5–1.7) together with very low vapor pressure (0–0.05 mmHg at 25 °C), consistent with condensed-phase persistence and contact-driven exposure rather than sustained vapor dispersion. QSAR-derived LD₅₀ values and dermal permeability coefficients varied across structural variants, demonstrating that predicted acute toxicity is not governed by a single descriptor. PASS-derived probabilities indicated elevated neurotoxicity likelihoods, while cholinergic activity probabilities showed stronger association with polarity-related descriptors (TPSA) than with lipophilicity alone. Principal Component Analysis (PC1 ≈ 81%, PC2 ≈ 13%) showed that descriptor variance was primarily driven by polarity–permeability balance rather than toxicity magnitude alone. Composite hazard ranking integrating inverse LD₅₀, permeability, and neurotoxicity probability identified structural variants combining higher predicted permeability and elevated activity probabilities as comparatively higher within the modeled set. All findings are restricted to the studied compounds and represent computational predictions rather than experimental measurements, providing a transparent and regulatory-aligned framework for comparative, non-experimental hazard assessmen under Chemical Weapons Convention constraints. • A multi-platform in silico framework was applied to five A-series nerve agents. • Physicochemical and toxicological endpoints were cross-validated across four tools. • A-series agents show intermediate volatility and V-series–like environmental persistence. • Strong structure–property–toxicity relationships were identified (r > 0.85, p < 0.05). • Results support regulatory-aligned, non-experimental hazard assessment of CWAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxicology Letters
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2026.111908
Primary Topic
Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Platform In Silico Assessment of Selected A-Series (Novichok) Nerve Agents: Physicochemical, Toxicological, and Mechanistic Insights

Sotiria Anastasiou, Michail Chalaris, Ioanna Kanavou
Toxicology Letters
Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
article

Multi-Platform In Silico Assessment of Selected A-Series (Novichok) Nerve Agents: Physicochemical, Toxicological, and Mechanistic Insights

Sotiria Anastasiou, Michail Chalaris, Ioanna Kanavou
article en

Abstract

A multi-platform in silico framework was developed to characterize five selected A-series (Novichok) nerve agents—A-230, A-232, and A-234 (each evaluated using Ellison- and Mirzayanov-type structural representations) [1,2] together with A-242 and A-262—through integrated physicochemical, toxicological, and biological-activity prediction. Four complementary computational platforms (ACD/Labs Percepta, OECD QSAR Toolbox, EPA T.E.S.T., and PASS Online) were combined within a reproducible workflow to support Structure–Property–Toxicity Relationship (SPTR) interpretation across eight modeled structures (n = 8). Predicted partitioning behavior indicated moderate lipophilicity (logP (GALAS) ≈ 0.5–1.7) together with very low vapor pressure (0–0.05 mmHg at 25 °C), consistent with condensed-phase persistence and contact-driven exposure rather than sustained vapor dispersion. QSAR-derived LD₅₀ values and dermal permeability coefficients varied across structural variants, demonstrating that predicted acute toxicity is not governed by a single descriptor. PASS-derived probabilities indicated elevated neurotoxicity likelihoods, while cholinergic activity probabilities showed stronger association with polarity-related descriptors (TPSA) than with lipophilicity alone. Principal Component Analysis (PC1 ≈ 81%, PC2 ≈ 13%) showed that descriptor variance was primarily driven by polarity–permeability balance rather than toxicity magnitude alone. Composite hazard ranking integrating inverse LD₅₀, permeability, and neurotoxicity probability identified structural variants combining higher predicted permeability and elevated activity probabilities as comparatively higher within the modeled set. All findings are restricted to the studied compounds and represent computational predictions rather than experimental measurements, providing a transparent and regulatory-aligned framework for comparative, non-experimental hazard assessmen under Chemical Weapons Convention constraints. • A multi-platform in silico framework was applied to five A-series nerve agents. • Physicochemical and toxicological endpoints were cross-validated across four tools. • A-series agents show intermediate volatility and V-series–like environmental persistence. • Strong structure–property–toxicity relationships were identified (r > 0.85, p < 0.05). • Results support regulatory-aligned, non-experimental hazard assessment of CWAs.

Toxicology Letters
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.