Families of Young People Who Self-Harm: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Their Experiences and Needs

BACKGROUND: Self-harm in young people is a pressing public health issue, with family support playing a crucial role in the young person's prognosis. Concurrently, the impact extends to families themselves, who must navigate caregiving responsibilities while also requiring support. Understanding these experiences is key to providing more effective assistance in their caregiving roles. AIM: With this mixed-methods systematic review we investigated the experiences, barriers, and needs of families of young people who self-harm. METHOD: Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted within PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in July 2024 and April 2025. Thirty-one studies were included in this review, and quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was employed for the quantitative data, while qualitative data were analysed with thematic synthesis. RESULTS: The quantitative findings revealed two themes: (1) the repercussions of self-harm in the family and (2) family support needs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) parents' emotional and psychological impact; (2) impact on parenting and the bond with the young person; (3) disruption of family dynamics; and (4) barriers to and pathways for family support. CONCLUSION: We discuss the implications of these findings, offering recommendations for future research and improvements in family support services to alleviate caregiver burden and foster supportive environments for recovery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2026.2666405
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Families of Young People Who Self-Harm: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Their Experiences and Needs

Beatriz Cação-Dias, Marta Brás, Inês Rothes, Cristina Nunes et al.
Archives of Suicide Research
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Families of Young People Who Self-Harm: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Their Experiences and Needs

Beatriz Cação-Dias, Marta Brás, Inês Rothes, Cristina Nunes, Cláudia Carmo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-harm in young people is a pressing public health issue, with family support playing a crucial role in the young person's prognosis. Concurrently, the impact extends to families themselves, who must navigate caregiving responsibilities while also requiring support. Understanding these experiences is key to providing more effective assistance in their caregiving roles. AIM: With this mixed-methods systematic review we investigated the experiences, barriers, and needs of families of young people who self-harm. METHOD: Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted within PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in July 2024 and April 2025. Thirty-one studies were included in this review, and quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was employed for the quantitative data, while qualitative data were analysed with thematic synthesis. RESULTS: The quantitative findings revealed two themes: (1) the repercussions of self-harm in the family and (2) family support needs. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: (1) parents' emotional and psychological impact; (2) impact on parenting and the bond with the young person; (3) disruption of family dynamics; and (4) barriers to and pathways for family support. CONCLUSION: We discuss the implications of these findings, offering recommendations for future research and improvements in family support services to alleviate caregiver burden and foster supportive environments for recovery.

Archives of Suicide Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.