Large Language Models in Professionalism and Ethical Decision-Making Education: A Transferable Process for Generating Concordance of Professional Judgment Items

PROBLEM: Concordance-based tools, such as the Concordance of Professional Judgment (CoPJ) tool, allow students to practice ethical decision-making and professionalism under uncertain conditions, but developing high-quality CoPJ items (including writing vignettes and convening expert panels) is resource intensive. Thus, programs often lack the practical infrastructure needed to integrate the CoPJ into curricula at the scale necessary for repeated learner practice. Large language models (LLMs) may help address this burden, but a transferable process to generate CoPJ items aligned with local ethics frameworks and expert oversight is needed. APPROACH: This study implemented and evaluated a transferable process for generating CoPJ items using general purpose LLMs. Using a generic zero-shot prompt, ChatGPT-5 Thinking and Gemini 2.5 Pro were each prompted to generate one CoPJ item for all 28 topics in the Turkish Medical Association's ethical declarations (56 items total) in August 2025. OUTCOMES: Between August and September 2025, 2 faculty reviewers independently rated each LLM-generated item using a 20-criterion checklist and 4-level global suitability judgment (accepted, minor revision, major revision, rejected), with adjudication as needed. Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved 96.4% overall global suitability, with 27/28 items judged to be suitable (accepted or minor revision). ChatGPT-5 Thinking's overall global suitability was 89.3% (25/28). Gemini 2.5 Pro had an overall mean checklist success score of 97.5% (19.5/20), and ChatGPT-5 Thinking had a score of 89.0% (17.8/20). NEXT STEPS: Future work will examine how LLM-generated CoPJ items function in real learning environments, including a planned learner-based comparison with human-written items. Additional studies across languages, professional programs, and cultural contexts will further help determine the broader adaptability of this process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Medicine
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/acamed/wvag147
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models in Professionalism and Ethical Decision-Making Education: A Transferable Process for Generating Concordance of Professional Judgment Items

Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Tuğba İş-Kara
Academic Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Large Language Models in Professionalism and Ethical Decision-Making Education: A Transferable Process for Generating Concordance of Professional Judgment Items

Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Tuğba İş-Kara
article en

Abstract

PROBLEM: Concordance-based tools, such as the Concordance of Professional Judgment (CoPJ) tool, allow students to practice ethical decision-making and professionalism under uncertain conditions, but developing high-quality CoPJ items (including writing vignettes and convening expert panels) is resource intensive. Thus, programs often lack the practical infrastructure needed to integrate the CoPJ into curricula at the scale necessary for repeated learner practice. Large language models (LLMs) may help address this burden, but a transferable process to generate CoPJ items aligned with local ethics frameworks and expert oversight is needed. APPROACH: This study implemented and evaluated a transferable process for generating CoPJ items using general purpose LLMs. Using a generic zero-shot prompt, ChatGPT-5 Thinking and Gemini 2.5 Pro were each prompted to generate one CoPJ item for all 28 topics in the Turkish Medical Association's ethical declarations (56 items total) in August 2025. OUTCOMES: Between August and September 2025, 2 faculty reviewers independently rated each LLM-generated item using a 20-criterion checklist and 4-level global suitability judgment (accepted, minor revision, major revision, rejected), with adjudication as needed. Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved 96.4% overall global suitability, with 27/28 items judged to be suitable (accepted or minor revision). ChatGPT-5 Thinking's overall global suitability was 89.3% (25/28). Gemini 2.5 Pro had an overall mean checklist success score of 97.5% (19.5/20), and ChatGPT-5 Thinking had a score of 89.0% (17.8/20). NEXT STEPS: Future work will examine how LLM-generated CoPJ items function in real learning environments, including a planned learner-based comparison with human-written items. Additional studies across languages, professional programs, and cultural contexts will further help determine the broader adaptability of this process.

Academic Medicine
Gazi University (TR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.