Managing generative AI as organizational change: evidence from a multi-institutional study in education

Purpose This paper presents findings from a 1.5-year multi-institutional study on the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into educational institutions under the Vienna Chamber of Commerce and Industry (WKW). Grounded in Luhmann’s social systems theory, the study conceptualizes GenAI integration as a challenge of organizational programming, requiring a shift from conditional (rule-based) to purposive (goal-oriented) approaches that accommodate technological uncertainty while fostering competency development. With the rapid rise of GenAI, educational institutions are facing a major organizational change that challenges established structures and routines and requires purposeful adaptation. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was applied across four institutions spanning secondary, vocational, tertiary, and adult education. The empirical study combined a large-scale learner survey (n = 1,577), educator focus groups (n = 23), and controlled experiments (n = 47) comparing student teams with and without access to GenAI. Findings Six critical success factors were identified. Beyond technical skills, outcomes depended on: (1) clear communication and role definition, (2) shared responsibility and team cohesion, (3) prior GenAI experience, (4) critical reflection on AI-generated content, (5) intrinsic motivation, and (6) capacity for innovative thinking. Strong teamwork yielded superior results regardless of AI use; unstructured AI adoption consistently weakened outcomes. Findings informed the establishment of a KI-Info-Hub, a centralized digital platform providing educators with access to training materials and evidence-based practices. Originality/value This study offers one of the first comprehensive, practice-based evaluations of GenAI in German-speaking vocational and higher education and provides actionable strategies for competency-oriented, human-centered GenAI integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-01-2026-0095
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing generative AI as organizational change: evidence from a multi-institutional study in education

Tilia Stingl de Vasconcelos Guedes, Isabel Rodenas, Patrick Rupprecht
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Managing generative AI as organizational change: evidence from a multi-institutional study in education

Tilia Stingl de Vasconcelos Guedes, Isabel Rodenas, Patrick Rupprecht
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper presents findings from a 1.5-year multi-institutional study on the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into educational institutions under the Vienna Chamber of Commerce and Industry (WKW). Grounded in Luhmann’s social systems theory, the study conceptualizes GenAI integration as a challenge of organizational programming, requiring a shift from conditional (rule-based) to purposive (goal-oriented) approaches that accommodate technological uncertainty while fostering competency development. With the rapid rise of GenAI, educational institutions are facing a major organizational change that challenges established structures and routines and requires purposeful adaptation. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was applied across four institutions spanning secondary, vocational, tertiary, and adult education. The empirical study combined a large-scale learner survey (n = 1,577), educator focus groups (n = 23), and controlled experiments (n = 47) comparing student teams with and without access to GenAI. Findings Six critical success factors were identified. Beyond technical skills, outcomes depended on: (1) clear communication and role definition, (2) shared responsibility and team cohesion, (3) prior GenAI experience, (4) critical reflection on AI-generated content, (5) intrinsic motivation, and (6) capacity for innovative thinking. Strong teamwork yielded superior results regardless of AI use; unstructured AI adoption consistently weakened outcomes. Findings informed the establishment of a KI-Info-Hub, a centralized digital platform providing educators with access to training materials and evidence-based practices. Originality/value This study offers one of the first comprehensive, practice-based evaluations of GenAI in German-speaking vocational and higher education and provides actionable strategies for competency-oriented, human-centered GenAI integration.

Journal of Organizational Change Management
Ministry of Economy (MK), Kazimieras Simonavičius University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.