Navigating the healthcare system with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic Variant: What do patients Value?

• Individuals with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) highly value clinician expertise. • Centralized care preferred for BRCA1/2 PV management. • Streamlined logistics and timely access to care strongly valued. • Psychosocial support and family resources are key priorities. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) confer elevated lifetime risk of malignancies, including breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Navigating care is complex; patient-reported preventive, psychosocial, and logistical needs remain poorly understood. We evaluated patient perspectives through a survey disseminated via advocacy networks. Individuals with self-reported BRCA1/2 PVs completed an anonymous 20-question survey on care preferences. The survey was distributed via email through advocacy and support networks. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics, clinical characteristics, and responses. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Thirty individuals visited the survey website with 90% (27) completion. Median age was 45 years (IQR, 38–68); 23 (85%) identified as non-Hispanic White, 3 (11%) Hispanic White, and 1 (4%) non-Hispanic Black. All participants identified as female. Participants valued a single clinician/institution managing BRCA1/2 PV-related needs (26, 96%) and same-day appointments (25, 93%). Participants preferred BRCA1/2 PV expertise among specialists managing ovarian and breast cancer screening (27, 100%), menopause management (25, 100%), and risk-reducing breast/gynecologic surgery (22, 96%). Twenty-one (78%) were interested in care at a hereditary cancer center. Qualitative analysis reinforced the value of physician expertise in clinical and psychological BRCA1/2 PV management and a centralized model of care that reduces lifelong logistical burden. Individuals with self-reported BRCA1/2 PVs preferred streamlined care through a single clinician/center, with expertise in cancer screening, risk-reducing surgery, and menopause management. A dedicated hereditary cancer program integrating clinical management, psychosocial support, and streamlined logistics may help improve care satisfaction, adherence, and confidence. These findings provide patient-centered guidance for optimizing care delivery in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2026.102104
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the healthcare system with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic Variant: What do patients Value?

Lauren Davis Rivera, Emily Epstein, Annie Ellis, Jaime Gilliland et al.
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Navigating the healthcare system with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic Variant: What do patients Value?

Lauren Davis Rivera, Emily Epstein, Annie Ellis, Jaime Gilliland, Sophia Sharaf, Max Kirby, Tina Karimaghaie, Stephanie V Blank, Christine Walsh, Melissa K Frey, Muhammad Danyal Ahsan, Steve Lopez, Emily M Webster, Sarah R Levi, Audra Vanroboys
article en

Abstract

• Individuals with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) highly value clinician expertise. • Centralized care preferred for BRCA1/2 PV management. • Streamlined logistics and timely access to care strongly valued. • Psychosocial support and family resources are key priorities. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) confer elevated lifetime risk of malignancies, including breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Navigating care is complex; patient-reported preventive, psychosocial, and logistical needs remain poorly understood. We evaluated patient perspectives through a survey disseminated via advocacy networks. Individuals with self-reported BRCA1/2 PVs completed an anonymous 20-question survey on care preferences. The survey was distributed via email through advocacy and support networks. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics, clinical characteristics, and responses. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Thirty individuals visited the survey website with 90% (27) completion. Median age was 45 years (IQR, 38–68); 23 (85%) identified as non-Hispanic White, 3 (11%) Hispanic White, and 1 (4%) non-Hispanic Black. All participants identified as female. Participants valued a single clinician/institution managing BRCA1/2 PV-related needs (26, 96%) and same-day appointments (25, 93%). Participants preferred BRCA1/2 PV expertise among specialists managing ovarian and breast cancer screening (27, 100%), menopause management (25, 100%), and risk-reducing breast/gynecologic surgery (22, 96%). Twenty-one (78%) were interested in care at a hereditary cancer center. Qualitative analysis reinforced the value of physician expertise in clinical and psychological BRCA1/2 PV management and a centralized model of care that reduces lifelong logistical burden. Individuals with self-reported BRCA1/2 PVs preferred streamlined care through a single clinician/center, with expertise in cancer screening, risk-reducing surgery, and menopause management. A dedicated hereditary cancer program integrating clinical management, psychosocial support, and streamlined logistics may help improve care satisfaction, adherence, and confidence. These findings provide patient-centered guidance for optimizing care delivery in this high-risk population.

Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Cornell University (US), Cancer Support Community (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.