Proclarix’ performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population
BACKGROUND: PSA testing is widely used for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but its low specificity leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Proclarix, a novel blood test combining serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), Cathepsin D (CTSD) and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) with age into a risk score, aims to improve risk stratification by predicting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in a Danish population using retrospective serum samples collected consecutively from patients with suspected PCa. METHODS: Proclarix' ability to reduce biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, defined as Grade Group < 2) was assessed in men with a PSA 2-10 ng/ml and a prostate volume of ≥ 35 ml (targeted population) compared with the percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC-RC). The secondary analysis included the performance of Proclarix' and Proclarix density compared with the %fPSA and PSA density (PSA-D) in a broader population with a PSA 2-20 ng/ml regardless of both prostate volume and DRE (extended population). Proclarix score is considered negative when it's below the cutoff 10%. RESULTS: In the targeted population (n = 373), a negative Proclarix test significantly reduced the probability of csPCa from 27% (pretest) to 5% (posttest, 95%CI: 0-10%), (p < 0.028) outperforming %fPSA (posttest 14%, 95%CI: 4-24%) and ERSPC-RC (posttest 20%, 95%CI: 4-36%). For the diagnosis of csPCa, Proclarix had a significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity of 22% (95%CI: 17-27%) at 97% sensitivity (95%CI: 94-100%) and 95% NPV (95%CI: 90-100%) than did %fPSA and the ERSPC-RC, with 14% (95%CI: 10-18%) and 7% (95%CI: 4-11%) specificity, respectively. In the extended population (n = 656), Proclarix density had significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity (39%, 95%CI: 35-44%) than did PSA-D (32%, 95%CI: 27-36%) at an equal sensitivity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Proclarix reduces prostate biopsies and ciPCa detection while maintaining a low risk of missing csPCa.
Authors
- T C Bog Hansen
- Gitte E. Kissow
- Ralph Schiess (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4955-1295)
- Alcibiade Athanasiou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-8325)
- Madlen M. E. Kasten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6958-5205)
- Ahmed H. Zedan
- Louise F. Øbro
- Mads H Poulsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-8402)
- Palle J Osther (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-1640)
- Jonna S Madsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-4714)
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Hospital South West Jutland (DK)
- SwissLitho (Switzerland) (CH)
- Lillebaelt Hospital (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Cancer
- Published
- 2026-05-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16118-8
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Syddansk Universitet