Proclarix’ performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population

BACKGROUND: PSA testing is widely used for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but its low specificity leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Proclarix, a novel blood test combining serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), Cathepsin D (CTSD) and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) with age into a risk score, aims to improve risk stratification by predicting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in a Danish population using retrospective serum samples collected consecutively from patients with suspected PCa. METHODS: Proclarix' ability to reduce biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, defined as Grade Group < 2) was assessed in men with a PSA 2-10 ng/ml and a prostate volume of ≥ 35 ml (targeted population) compared with the percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC-RC). The secondary analysis included the performance of Proclarix' and Proclarix density compared with the %fPSA and PSA density (PSA-D) in a broader population with a PSA 2-20 ng/ml regardless of both prostate volume and DRE (extended population). Proclarix score is considered negative when it's below the cutoff 10%. RESULTS: In the targeted population (n = 373), a negative Proclarix test significantly reduced the probability of csPCa from 27% (pretest) to 5% (posttest, 95%CI: 0-10%), (p < 0.028) outperforming %fPSA (posttest 14%, 95%CI: 4-24%) and ERSPC-RC (posttest 20%, 95%CI: 4-36%). For the diagnosis of csPCa, Proclarix had a significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity of 22% (95%CI: 17-27%) at 97% sensitivity (95%CI: 94-100%) and 95% NPV (95%CI: 90-100%) than did %fPSA and the ERSPC-RC, with 14% (95%CI: 10-18%) and 7% (95%CI: 4-11%) specificity, respectively. In the extended population (n = 656), Proclarix density had significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity (39%, 95%CI: 35-44%) than did PSA-D (32%, 95%CI: 27-36%) at an equal sensitivity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Proclarix reduces prostate biopsies and ciPCa detection while maintaining a low risk of missing csPCa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16118-8
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proclarix’ performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population

T C Bog Hansen, Gitte E. Kissow, Ralph Schiess, Alcibiade Athanasiou et al.
BMC Cancer
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Proclarix’ performance in ruling out patients with no or indolent prostate cancer: evaluation in a Danish population

T C Bog Hansen, Gitte E. Kissow, Ralph Schiess, Alcibiade Athanasiou, Madlen M. E. Kasten, Ahmed H. Zedan, Louise F. Øbro, Mads H Poulsen, Palle J Osther, Jonna S Madsen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PSA testing is widely used for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), but its low specificity leads to overdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Proclarix, a novel blood test combining serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA (%fPSA), Cathepsin D (CTSD) and Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) with age into a risk score, aims to improve risk stratification by predicting clinically significant PCa (csPCa). This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in a Danish population using retrospective serum samples collected consecutively from patients with suspected PCa. METHODS: Proclarix' ability to reduce biopsies and detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa, defined as Grade Group < 2) was assessed in men with a PSA 2-10 ng/ml and a prostate volume of ≥ 35 ml (targeted population) compared with the percentage of free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC-RC). The secondary analysis included the performance of Proclarix' and Proclarix density compared with the %fPSA and PSA density (PSA-D) in a broader population with a PSA 2-20 ng/ml regardless of both prostate volume and DRE (extended population). Proclarix score is considered negative when it's below the cutoff 10%. RESULTS: In the targeted population (n = 373), a negative Proclarix test significantly reduced the probability of csPCa from 27% (pretest) to 5% (posttest, 95%CI: 0-10%), (p < 0.028) outperforming %fPSA (posttest 14%, 95%CI: 4-24%) and ERSPC-RC (posttest 20%, 95%CI: 4-36%). For the diagnosis of csPCa, Proclarix had a significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity of 22% (95%CI: 17-27%) at 97% sensitivity (95%CI: 94-100%) and 95% NPV (95%CI: 90-100%) than did %fPSA and the ERSPC-RC, with 14% (95%CI: 10-18%) and 7% (95%CI: 4-11%) specificity, respectively. In the extended population (n = 656), Proclarix density had significantly (p < 0.01) greater specificity (39%, 95%CI: 35-44%) than did PSA-D (32%, 95%CI: 27-36%) at an equal sensitivity of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Proclarix reduces prostate biopsies and ciPCa detection while maintaining a low risk of missing csPCa.

BMC Cancer
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Region of Southern Denmark (DK), Hospital South West Jutland (DK), SwissLitho (Switzerland) (CH), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK)
Syddansk Universitet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.