Survival and safety: wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy in NSCLC

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of three surgical methods (wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 130 NSCLC patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery. Patients were categorized into wedge resection (n = 50), segmentectomy (n = 40) and lobectomy (n = 40) groups. Baseline characteristics, perioperative parameters (operative time, drainage time, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative adverse events (reoperation, atrial arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, prolonged air leak, pulmonary infection, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis), and survival rates stratified by tumor diameter (< 1.0 cm, 1.1-2.0 cm) were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). For tumors < 1.0 cm, the overall survival (OS) rates were similar among wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy groups (88% vs. 90.48% vs. 91.30%) (P > 0.05). In tumors measuring 1.1-2.0 cm, the observed OS rates were 92.00% for wedge resection, 63.16% for segmentectomy, and 64.71% for lobectomy (P < 0.05). The three surgical approaches showed significant differences in the number of lymph nodes sampled, the detection rate of positive lymph nodes, and the resection method (P < 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the margin status (P > 0.05). Wedge resection was associated with the shortest operative time and drainage time (P < 0.05), while length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly across the three approaches (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse events presented no discernible difference in the three surgical approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For tumors smaller than 1 cm, wedge resection was associated with OS similar to that of segmentectomy and lobectomy. For selected tumors measuring 1.1-2.0 cm, wedge resection was associated with higher observed OS in this cohort and with shorter operative and drainage times; prospective validation is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03805-3
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival and safety: wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy in NSCLC

Lin Qiu, Pingping Shao
BMC Surgery
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Survival and safety: wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy in NSCLC

Lin Qiu, Pingping Shao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of three surgical methods (wedge resection, segmentectomy and lobectomy) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 130 NSCLC patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery. Patients were categorized into wedge resection (n = 50), segmentectomy (n = 40) and lobectomy (n = 40) groups. Baseline characteristics, perioperative parameters (operative time, drainage time, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative adverse events (reoperation, atrial arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, prolonged air leak, pulmonary infection, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis), and survival rates stratified by tumor diameter (< 1.0 cm, 1.1-2.0 cm) were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). For tumors < 1.0 cm, the overall survival (OS) rates were similar among wedge resection, segmentectomy, and lobectomy groups (88% vs. 90.48% vs. 91.30%) (P > 0.05). In tumors measuring 1.1-2.0 cm, the observed OS rates were 92.00% for wedge resection, 63.16% for segmentectomy, and 64.71% for lobectomy (P < 0.05). The three surgical approaches showed significant differences in the number of lymph nodes sampled, the detection rate of positive lymph nodes, and the resection method (P < 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the margin status (P > 0.05). Wedge resection was associated with the shortest operative time and drainage time (P < 0.05), while length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly across the three approaches (P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse events presented no discernible difference in the three surgical approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For tumors smaller than 1 cm, wedge resection was associated with OS similar to that of segmentectomy and lobectomy. For selected tumors measuring 1.1-2.0 cm, wedge resection was associated with higher observed OS in this cohort and with shorter operative and drainage times; prospective validation is needed.

BMC Surgery
Huzhou Normal University (CN), The People's Hospital of LinXia (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.