When service recovery promises meet bystander comments: a cross-cultural study of complaint responses

Abstract This study examines how consumers from individualistic and collectivistic consumer markets form recovery expectations and loyalty intentions in response to service recovery promises and bystander comments on social media. Across two experiments, we find that complainants’ origin fundamentally shapes how they interpret recovery efforts. Individualistic consumers exposed to non-accommodative recovery promises respond more favorably when accompanied by positive consumer comments. In contrast, collectivistic consumers report higher recovery expectations and intentions when the same promises are paired with negative comments. Importantly, bystander comments exert greater influence when companies issue non-accommodative rather than accommodative responses across both markets. This research is the first to reveal that complainant origin (culture) and bystander presence jointly moderate the effects of recovery communications. The findings challenge uniform global customer behavior assumptions and offer actionable insights for managing service failures in global markets. The study advances online service recovery theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Commerce Research
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-026-10132-5
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When service recovery promises meet bystander comments: a cross-cultural study of complaint responses

Sanchayan Sengupta, Raffaele Filieri, Wolfgang J. Weitzl
Electronic Commerce Research
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

When service recovery promises meet bystander comments: a cross-cultural study of complaint responses

Sanchayan Sengupta, Raffaele Filieri, Wolfgang J. Weitzl
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how consumers from individualistic and collectivistic consumer markets form recovery expectations and loyalty intentions in response to service recovery promises and bystander comments on social media. Across two experiments, we find that complainants’ origin fundamentally shapes how they interpret recovery efforts. Individualistic consumers exposed to non-accommodative recovery promises respond more favorably when accompanied by positive consumer comments. In contrast, collectivistic consumers report higher recovery expectations and intentions when the same promises are paired with negative comments. Importantly, bystander comments exert greater influence when companies issue non-accommodative rather than accommodative responses across both markets. This research is the first to reveal that complainant origin (culture) and bystander presence jointly moderate the effects of recovery communications. The findings challenge uniform global customer behavior assumptions and offer actionable insights for managing service failures in global markets. The study advances online service recovery theory.

Electronic Commerce Research
University of Vienna (AT), Audencia Business School (FR), University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT), ESSCA School of Management (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.