Trading in disorder: the crisis of globalization and the future of trade policy

Abstract International trade is undergoing a period of profound upheaval. Politicians and observers have been trying to identify a paradigm that can capture the new disorder. This essay argues that no single paradigm is emerging; instead, trade policies are changing along several dimensions simultaneously. We can make sense of the new complexity by tracing those changes along four dimensions: the purposes for which governments regulate trade, the partners with whom they want businesses to trade, the products and services that they want to see traded, and the tools that they use to regulate trade. An analysis along these lines shows that competing narratives about globalization are motivating governments to embrace a multipurpose trade policy; to take a much more selective approach to their trading partners; to develop trade policies that are tailored to specific products, services, and supply chains; and to employ a much wider range of tools to shape supply chains than they did even a decade ago.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Business Policy
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-026-00247-9
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trading in disorder: the crisis of globalization and the future of trade policy

Nicolas Lamp
Journal of International Business Policy
Global trade and economics
article

Trading in disorder: the crisis of globalization and the future of trade policy

Nicolas Lamp
article en

Abstract

Abstract International trade is undergoing a period of profound upheaval. Politicians and observers have been trying to identify a paradigm that can capture the new disorder. This essay argues that no single paradigm is emerging; instead, trade policies are changing along several dimensions simultaneously. We can make sense of the new complexity by tracing those changes along four dimensions: the purposes for which governments regulate trade, the partners with whom they want businesses to trade, the products and services that they want to see traded, and the tools that they use to regulate trade. An analysis along these lines shows that competing narratives about globalization are motivating governments to embrace a multipurpose trade policy; to take a much more selective approach to their trading partners; to develop trade policies that are tailored to specific products, services, and supply chains; and to employ a much wider range of tools to shape supply chains than they did even a decade ago.

Journal of International Business Policy
Queen's University (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.