Environmental Pressure Measurement: A Composite and Discriminant Approach

This paper presents a planning-focused statistical approach to the measurement and interpretation of environmental pressure in diverse economic systems. The paper concentrates on OECD and BRICS nations during the period 2000-2023, using a distance-based composite indicator and multivariate classification methods to inform evidence-based environmental and industrial planning. Environmental pressure is assessed by a non-compensatory composite index based on carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrate emissions, reflecting structural stress generated by energy consumption, industry, and agriculture. The composite index facilitates longitudinal analysis and cross-national comparison, offering a composite yet policy-useful measure of aggregate environmental pressure. To provide a dynamic perspective, Linear Discriminant Analysis is used to assess whether emission structures distinguish statistically advanced and emerging economies and to specify transition or hybrid patterns. The findings indicate the persistent diversity of institutional categories and the increasingly blurred line between OECD and BRICS nations. Misclassifications are interpreted not as model errors, but as statistically meaningful signals of structural transition and partial convergence in emission profiles. This evidence challenges rigid development-based classifications and supports a continuum-based interpretation of environmental pressure. From a socio-economic planning perspective, the proposed framework enhances statistical measurement for sustainability by linking composite indicators with structural diagnostics. It provides a decision-support tool for identifying transition cases, monitoring convergence processes, and designing differentiated environmental policies aligned with country-specific emission structures rather than institutional labels alone. • Integrated DP2 index and discriminant analysis for environmental pressure • OECD–BRICS patterns show heterogeneity and partial convergence • Misclassification reveals transition and hybrid emission structures • Evidence supports a continuum-based policy approach

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102502
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Pressure Measurement: A Composite and Discriminant Approach

Enrico Musso, Martina De Anna, Tommaso Filì
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Environmental Pressure Measurement: A Composite and Discriminant Approach

Enrico Musso, Martina De Anna, Tommaso Filì
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a planning-focused statistical approach to the measurement and interpretation of environmental pressure in diverse economic systems. The paper concentrates on OECD and BRICS nations during the period 2000-2023, using a distance-based composite indicator and multivariate classification methods to inform evidence-based environmental and industrial planning. Environmental pressure is assessed by a non-compensatory composite index based on carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrate emissions, reflecting structural stress generated by energy consumption, industry, and agriculture. The composite index facilitates longitudinal analysis and cross-national comparison, offering a composite yet policy-useful measure of aggregate environmental pressure. To provide a dynamic perspective, Linear Discriminant Analysis is used to assess whether emission structures distinguish statistically advanced and emerging economies and to specify transition or hybrid patterns. The findings indicate the persistent diversity of institutional categories and the increasingly blurred line between OECD and BRICS nations. Misclassifications are interpreted not as model errors, but as statistically meaningful signals of structural transition and partial convergence in emission profiles. This evidence challenges rigid development-based classifications and supports a continuum-based interpretation of environmental pressure. From a socio-economic planning perspective, the proposed framework enhances statistical measurement for sustainability by linking composite indicators with structural diagnostics. It provides a decision-support tool for identifying transition cases, monitoring convergence processes, and designing differentiated environmental policies aligned with country-specific emission structures rather than institutional labels alone. • Integrated DP2 index and discriminant analysis for environmental pressure • OECD–BRICS patterns show heterogeneity and partial convergence • Misclassification reveals transition and hybrid emission structures • Evidence supports a continuum-based policy approach

Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.