Perspectives of French community-dwelling older adults on the use of digital services: a qualitative study based on interviews

BACKGROUND: Everyday services are increasingly being digitalised, while the proportion of older adults continues to grow. Ensuring that digital services are accessible to this population is essential to prevent digital exclusion and support autonomy. This study aimed to explore older adults' perspectives, experiences, and needs regarding digital services, identify perceived barriers to accessibility, and examine associated ethical and societal concerns. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study recruited 48 French community-dwelling older adults in France (28 women, 20 men; mean age = 76.06 years, SD = 9.21; 42 urban, 6 rural). Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an 18-item guide developed from a review of the literature on digital accessibility. The study design and reporting were informed by the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, pseudonymised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Coding was performed independently by two researchers, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. RESULTS: All participants reported using at least one digital technology, primarily for communication, information-seeking, administrative procedures, entertainment, and, more rarely, for professional or obligatory tasks. Participants described both advantages (e.g., convenience, ergonomic interfaces) and difficulties (e.g., lack of support, interface complexity, technical failures), leading to diverse coping strategies such as seeking help, self-learning, delegation, or avoiding digital tools when possible. Feelings toward digitalisation were ambivalent, combining perceived benefits with frustration, concerns about data security, and reflections on the impact of digitalisation on autonomy and human relationships. Participants also identified barriers to accessibility (e.g., lack of digital literacy, financial constraints, poor design, insufficient support) and proposed concrete solutions, emphasising the importance of accessible design, non-digital alternatives, adapted training, and human assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Digitalisation offers opportunities for older adults but also raises accessibility, ethical, and societal challenges. While many participants recognised the usefulness of digital services, they also highlighted risks related to autonomy, perceived choice, and reduced human contact. These findings underscore the need for digital services that are inclusive, intuitive, and supported by continuous human assistance to avoid reinforcing existing inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07511-w
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of French community-dwelling older adults on the use of digital services: a qualitative study based on interviews

S. DaCunha, M. Chetouani, A. S. Rigaud, E. Perrot et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Perspectives of French community-dwelling older adults on the use of digital services: a qualitative study based on interviews

S. DaCunha, M. Chetouani, A. S. Rigaud, E. Perrot, M. Pino, J. Cattoni
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Everyday services are increasingly being digitalised, while the proportion of older adults continues to grow. Ensuring that digital services are accessible to this population is essential to prevent digital exclusion and support autonomy. This study aimed to explore older adults' perspectives, experiences, and needs regarding digital services, identify perceived barriers to accessibility, and examine associated ethical and societal concerns. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study recruited 48 French community-dwelling older adults in France (28 women, 20 men; mean age = 76.06 years, SD = 9.21; 42 urban, 6 rural). Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an 18-item guide developed from a review of the literature on digital accessibility. The study design and reporting were informed by the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, pseudonymised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Coding was performed independently by two researchers, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. RESULTS: All participants reported using at least one digital technology, primarily for communication, information-seeking, administrative procedures, entertainment, and, more rarely, for professional or obligatory tasks. Participants described both advantages (e.g., convenience, ergonomic interfaces) and difficulties (e.g., lack of support, interface complexity, technical failures), leading to diverse coping strategies such as seeking help, self-learning, delegation, or avoiding digital tools when possible. Feelings toward digitalisation were ambivalent, combining perceived benefits with frustration, concerns about data security, and reflections on the impact of digitalisation on autonomy and human relationships. Participants also identified barriers to accessibility (e.g., lack of digital literacy, financial constraints, poor design, insufficient support) and proposed concrete solutions, emphasising the importance of accessible design, non-digital alternatives, adapted training, and human assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Digitalisation offers opportunities for older adults but also raises accessibility, ethical, and societal challenges. While many participants recognised the usefulness of digital services, they also highlighted risks related to autonomy, perceived choice, and reduced human contact. These findings underscore the need for digital services that are inclusive, intuitive, and supported by continuous human assistance to avoid reinforcing existing inequalities.

BMC Geriatrics
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Broca (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.