Effect of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotics on nonoperative management outcomes in uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Although antibiotics are a recognized alternative to appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, their specific benefit over observation alone remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to isolate the antibiotic effect by directly contrasting antibiotics with observation in patients receiving nonoperative management (NOM) for uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry from inception to October 5, 2025, to identify randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing antibiotics versus observation (no antibiotics) for NOM. We defined treatment success at 30 days as the primary endpoint. To assess the potential risk-of-bias (ROB), the Cochrane RoB 2 instrument was employed, while the overall certainty of our findings was determined through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: Three trials involving 437 participants were included: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one quasi-RCT. Analysis restricted to RCTs demonstrated no significant effect of antibiotics on initial treatment success (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Analysis across three studies showed no significant differences in recurrence (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.68-2.80) or the need for appendectomy during follow-up (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.66-1.47). Evidence certainty was low for the primary outcome and very low for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether antibiotics provide additional benefit over observation for uncomplicated appendicitis. Larger, adequately powered trials are needed to establish the comparative effectiveness of these approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05147-1
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotics on nonoperative management outcomes in uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei‐Tang Lin, Yun-Kuan Lin, Yu-Ning Huang, Jen-Hung Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Effect of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotics on nonoperative management outcomes in uncomplicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wei‐Tang Lin, Yun-Kuan Lin, Yu-Ning Huang, Jen-Hung Wang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although antibiotics are a recognized alternative to appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis, their specific benefit over observation alone remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to isolate the antibiotic effect by directly contrasting antibiotics with observation in patients receiving nonoperative management (NOM) for uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry from inception to October 5, 2025, to identify randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing antibiotics versus observation (no antibiotics) for NOM. We defined treatment success at 30 days as the primary endpoint. To assess the potential risk-of-bias (ROB), the Cochrane RoB 2 instrument was employed, while the overall certainty of our findings was determined through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. RESULTS: Three trials involving 437 participants were included: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one quasi-RCT. Analysis restricted to RCTs demonstrated no significant effect of antibiotics on initial treatment success (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.15). Analysis across three studies showed no significant differences in recurrence (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.68-2.80) or the need for appendectomy during follow-up (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.66-1.47). Evidence certainty was low for the primary outcome and very low for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether antibiotics provide additional benefit over observation for uncomplicated appendicitis. Larger, adequately powered trials are needed to establish the comparative effectiveness of these approaches.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Hualien Tzu Chi Medical Center (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.