A geography of access to justice: mapping social welfare legal aid need and provision in England and Wales

Abstract Our research combined statistical data, interviews, and geographic information system (GIS) tools to map social welfare legal aid ‘deserts’ in England and Wales. This novel mixed methodology enabled us to explore the spatiality of unmet legal aid need. We show that provision may be spatially uneven even where provider offices do exist, indicating that some legal desert areas have gone unidentified (absolute shortage), that contracted provider offices may not in fact be undertaking any legal aid work even when surrounded by areas of likely legal aid need (obscured shortage), and that certain types of provision may be unavailable even where other types are available, while few areas have provision for multiple legal problems (partial shortage). These findings call into question the commonly used dichotomy of met and unmet legal aid need. We argue that our findings demonstrate that a market‐based scheme alone cannot meet the need for legal aid provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.70063
Primary Topic
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A geography of access to justice: mapping social welfare legal aid need and provision in England and Wales

CHRIS EMBERSON, JO WILDING
Journal of Law and Society
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
article

A geography of access to justice: mapping social welfare legal aid need and provision in England and Wales

CHRIS EMBERSON, JO WILDING
article en

Abstract

Abstract Our research combined statistical data, interviews, and geographic information system (GIS) tools to map social welfare legal aid ‘deserts’ in England and Wales. This novel mixed methodology enabled us to explore the spatiality of unmet legal aid need. We show that provision may be spatially uneven even where provider offices do exist, indicating that some legal desert areas have gone unidentified (absolute shortage), that contracted provider offices may not in fact be undertaking any legal aid work even when surrounded by areas of likely legal aid need (obscured shortage), and that certain types of provision may be unavailable even where other types are available, while few areas have provision for multiple legal problems (partial shortage). These findings call into question the commonly used dichotomy of met and unmet legal aid need. We argue that our findings demonstrate that a market‐based scheme alone cannot meet the need for legal aid provision.

Journal of Law and Society
University of Sussex (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal Education and Practice Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A geography of access to justice: mapping social welfare legal aid need and provision in England and Wales — CHRIS EMBERSON, JO WILDING · Journal of Law and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS