Time is Money: The Social Benefits of Time-of-Use Tariffs

In this study, we first estimate the impact of a mandatory time-of-use (TOU) pricing policy on the aggregate electricity load and find evidence for statistically significant load-shifting effects. Next, we develop a data-driven method to examine the impact of the TOU pricing policy on social benefits in the electricity industry, including reductions in fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, capital investment in generation capacity, transmission congestion, and ancillary services. Our estimates reveal that the TOU tariffs yielded social benefits equivalent to 4.5 percent of wholesale electricity generation costs. With tariff redesign, this percentage could increase to 7.6 percent. Our analysis suggests that, when formulating TOU tariffs, policymakers should prioritize their impact on capital investment, from which the majority of social benefits (98%) stem. JEL Classification: D40, Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: General; L94, Electric Utilities; D61, Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis; C15, Statistical Simulation Methods: General

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574261438736
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time is Money: The Social Benefits of Time-of-Use Tariffs

Bowei Guo, Feng Song, Ao Sun
The Energy Journal
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

Time is Money: The Social Benefits of Time-of-Use Tariffs

Bowei Guo, Feng Song, Ao Sun
article en

Abstract

In this study, we first estimate the impact of a mandatory time-of-use (TOU) pricing policy on the aggregate electricity load and find evidence for statistically significant load-shifting effects. Next, we develop a data-driven method to examine the impact of the TOU pricing policy on social benefits in the electricity industry, including reductions in fuel costs, greenhouse gas emissions, capital investment in generation capacity, transmission congestion, and ancillary services. Our estimates reveal that the TOU tariffs yielded social benefits equivalent to 4.5 percent of wholesale electricity generation costs. With tariff redesign, this percentage could increase to 7.6 percent. Our analysis suggests that, when formulating TOU tariffs, policymakers should prioritize their impact on capital investment, from which the majority of social benefits (98%) stem. JEL Classification: D40, Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: General; L94, Electric Utilities; D61, Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis; C15, Statistical Simulation Methods: General

The Energy Journal
Renmin University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Renmin University of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.