From fiction to facts: on the safety, rules, perception, and role of food additives

Consumer perceptions of food additives are often negative, driven by unfamiliar terminology, associations with "ultra‑processed food," and concerns about reduced naturalness. Despite this, additives play essential roles in food preservation, sensory quality, and safety, and undergo rigorous safety evaluation in jurisdictions worldwide by authoritative bodies such as JECFA, EFSA, and the (US-)FDA. While some studies suggest possible effects of specific emulsifiers or sweeteners on the microbiome or metabolism, evidence is limited and often not reflective of real dietary exposure. Broader claims-such as additives causing "hyper‑palatability" or "food addiction"-lack scientific support, with research showing that overeating is more closely linked to energy density and food availability than additives themselves. Reducing additives use, without sound scientific justification, may inadvertently worsen nutrient profiles of foods, and increase food waste and health risks. Improving public understanding of additives safety and function is essential to counter misconceptions and avoid counterproductive reformulation decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2026.2669055
Primary Topic
Dye analysis and toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From fiction to facts: on the safety, rules, perception, and role of food additives

Liisa Lähteenmäki, Vincenzo Fogliano, Gert W. Meijer, Lilia M. Ahrné et al.
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Dye analysis and toxicity
article

From fiction to facts: on the safety, rules, perception, and role of food additives

Liisa Lähteenmäki, Vincenzo Fogliano, Gert W. Meijer, Lilia M. Ahrné, Ciarán G. Forde, David Labbe
article en

Abstract

Consumer perceptions of food additives are often negative, driven by unfamiliar terminology, associations with "ultra‑processed food," and concerns about reduced naturalness. Despite this, additives play essential roles in food preservation, sensory quality, and safety, and undergo rigorous safety evaluation in jurisdictions worldwide by authoritative bodies such as JECFA, EFSA, and the (US-)FDA. While some studies suggest possible effects of specific emulsifiers or sweeteners on the microbiome or metabolism, evidence is limited and often not reflective of real dietary exposure. Broader claims-such as additives causing "hyper‑palatability" or "food addiction"-lack scientific support, with research showing that overeating is more closely linked to energy density and food availability than additives themselves. Reducing additives use, without sound scientific justification, may inadvertently worsen nutrient profiles of foods, and increase food waste and health risks. Improving public understanding of additives safety and function is essential to counter misconceptions and avoid counterproductive reformulation decisions.

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
University of Copenhagen (DK), United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US), Aarhus University (DK), PATH To Reading (US), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dye analysis and toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.