Responses of macrobenthic communities to artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration in the intertidal zone of Yueqing Bay, China

Human activities have caused considerable ecological losses, and while large-scale restoration efforts have already been initiated, the ecological effectiveness of these coastal artificial measures and projects remains unclear. To elucidate the ecological impacts of artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration, this study quantified macrobenthic biodiversity across six representative intertidal habitats — natural rock reefs, artificial seawalls, bare tidal flats (in the middle and low intertidal zones), Spartina alterniflora marshes, and restored tidal flats (following S. alterniflora removal) — in Yueqing Bay, China, during May and October 2024. Intuitively, natural rock reefs supported greater abundance, biomass, and diversity than artificial seawalls. Compared to bare tidal flats, transplantation mangroves exhibited higher biomass but lower species richness and diversity, and restored tidal flats showed seasonally increased species richness but decreased diversity. Additionally, no significant differences in macrobenthic communities were observed between artificial seawalls and natural rock reef or between bare and restored tidal flats, suggesting that variations were primarily reflected in species diversity rather than shifts in dominant species or compositional structure. In contrast, the community structure in transplantation mangroves differed significantly from that in other habitats. Overall, the negative effects on macrobenthic diversity of artificial seawalls in the high intertidal zone and positive signals from coastal ecological restoration in the middle intertidal zone are evident. Given the expanding scale of artificial constructions and coastal ecological restoration in intertidal zones, continuous ecological monitoring is essential to ensure sustainable development. • Assessed macrobenthic biodiversity across six intertidal habitats to evaluate the ecological effects of artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration (i.e. transplantation mangroves and Spartina alterniflor a eradication). • Natural rock reefs supported higher abundance, biomass, and diversity than artificial seawalls. • Transplantation mangroves had higher biomass but lower species richness and diversity than bare tidal flats. • Compared to bare tidal flats, restored tidal flats showed seasonal increases in species richness but decreases in diversity. • Continuous ecological monitoring is required to ensure sustainable development under expanding artificial constructions and coastal ecological restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04247
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses of macrobenthic communities to artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration in the intertidal zone of Yueqing Bay, China

Liu Jin, Yingting Shen, Lu Shou, Yibo Liao et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

Responses of macrobenthic communities to artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration in the intertidal zone of Yueqing Bay, China

Liu Jin, Yingting Shen, Lu Shou, Yibo Liao, Yanbin Tang, Jiangning Zeng, Qiang Liu, Rongliang Zhang
article en

Abstract

Human activities have caused considerable ecological losses, and while large-scale restoration efforts have already been initiated, the ecological effectiveness of these coastal artificial measures and projects remains unclear. To elucidate the ecological impacts of artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration, this study quantified macrobenthic biodiversity across six representative intertidal habitats — natural rock reefs, artificial seawalls, bare tidal flats (in the middle and low intertidal zones), Spartina alterniflora marshes, and restored tidal flats (following S. alterniflora removal) — in Yueqing Bay, China, during May and October 2024. Intuitively, natural rock reefs supported greater abundance, biomass, and diversity than artificial seawalls. Compared to bare tidal flats, transplantation mangroves exhibited higher biomass but lower species richness and diversity, and restored tidal flats showed seasonally increased species richness but decreased diversity. Additionally, no significant differences in macrobenthic communities were observed between artificial seawalls and natural rock reef or between bare and restored tidal flats, suggesting that variations were primarily reflected in species diversity rather than shifts in dominant species or compositional structure. In contrast, the community structure in transplantation mangroves differed significantly from that in other habitats. Overall, the negative effects on macrobenthic diversity of artificial seawalls in the high intertidal zone and positive signals from coastal ecological restoration in the middle intertidal zone are evident. Given the expanding scale of artificial constructions and coastal ecological restoration in intertidal zones, continuous ecological monitoring is essential to ensure sustainable development. • Assessed macrobenthic biodiversity across six intertidal habitats to evaluate the ecological effects of artificial seawalls and coastal ecological restoration (i.e. transplantation mangroves and Spartina alterniflor a eradication). • Natural rock reefs supported higher abundance, biomass, and diversity than artificial seawalls. • Transplantation mangroves had higher biomass but lower species richness and diversity than bare tidal flats. • Compared to bare tidal flats, restored tidal flats showed seasonal increases in species richness but decreases in diversity. • Continuous ecological monitoring is required to ensure sustainable development under expanding artificial constructions and coastal ecological restoration.

Global Ecology and Conservation
Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Second Institute of Oceanography (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Second Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.