Ranking Group-Level Outcomes with Multilevel Models: An Information-Theoretic Measure of Statistical Separation

Social epidemiologists frequently aim to quantify how social, spatial, or organizational contexts shape individual outcomes, an aim commonly addressed through the use of multilevel models. These models readily estimate the magnitude of group-level differences, but it is more difficult to formalize the uncertainty in the relative ordering of predicted group-level outcomes, which is often considered qualitatively in practice. We propose an entropy-based coefficient, grounded in information theory, which quantifies the stability of predicted group-level rankings. This metric, termed the separation statistic , integrates both the magnitude of group-level differences and their statistical uncertainty, providing a principled summary of how well groups are separated in terms of their predicted outcomes. Our motivation is drawn from Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), a widely used approach in social epidemiology for assessing group-level heterogeneity with multilevel models. We show how the separation statistic can be applied to group-level predictions derived from MAIHDA models and is compatible with both Bayesian and frequentist estimation approaches. The metric can be computed globally, across all groups, or locally, within specific subsets of interest. We demonstrate its utility using applied examples from intersectional MAIHDA and provide accompanying code to facilitate its use in future studies. By quantifying the stability of group-level predictions, the separation statistic offers a broadly applicable tool for describing certainty in the relative ordering of outcomes from multilevel models. Importantly, it should be interpreted as a descriptive measure of ranking uncertainty rather than a prescriptive target, with its limitations carefully considered in applied settings. • We propose a method for quantifying the separation between group-level predictions • The method is based on mathematical principles of information theory and entropy • This has immediate applications to MAIHDA, as demonstrated in empirical examples • This also has broader applications to multilevel and predictive models more generally • R and Stata code are provided for researchers to implement this in their analyses

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119391
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ranking Group-Level Outcomes with Multilevel Models: An Information-Theoretic Measure of Statistical Separation

Juan Merlo, Nasir Z. Bashir, George Leckie
Social Science & Medicine
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Ranking Group-Level Outcomes with Multilevel Models: An Information-Theoretic Measure of Statistical Separation

Juan Merlo, Nasir Z. Bashir, George Leckie
article en

Abstract

Social epidemiologists frequently aim to quantify how social, spatial, or organizational contexts shape individual outcomes, an aim commonly addressed through the use of multilevel models. These models readily estimate the magnitude of group-level differences, but it is more difficult to formalize the uncertainty in the relative ordering of predicted group-level outcomes, which is often considered qualitatively in practice. We propose an entropy-based coefficient, grounded in information theory, which quantifies the stability of predicted group-level rankings. This metric, termed the separation statistic , integrates both the magnitude of group-level differences and their statistical uncertainty, providing a principled summary of how well groups are separated in terms of their predicted outcomes. Our motivation is drawn from Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), a widely used approach in social epidemiology for assessing group-level heterogeneity with multilevel models. We show how the separation statistic can be applied to group-level predictions derived from MAIHDA models and is compatible with both Bayesian and frequentist estimation approaches. The metric can be computed globally, across all groups, or locally, within specific subsets of interest. We demonstrate its utility using applied examples from intersectional MAIHDA and provide accompanying code to facilitate its use in future studies. By quantifying the stability of group-level predictions, the separation statistic offers a broadly applicable tool for describing certainty in the relative ordering of outcomes from multilevel models. Importantly, it should be interpreted as a descriptive measure of ranking uncertainty rather than a prescriptive target, with its limitations carefully considered in applied settings. • We propose a method for quantifying the separation between group-level predictions • The method is based on mathematical principles of information theory and entropy • This has immediate applications to MAIHDA, as demonstrated in empirical examples • This also has broader applications to multilevel and predictive models more generally • R and Stata code are provided for researchers to implement this in their analyses

Social Science & Medicine
Lund University (SE), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Bristol (GB), MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.