Older adults and online health misinformation: a systematic literature review

As older adults increasingly rely on the internet for health-related information, concerns about their vulnerability to online health misinformation have intensified. This systematic literature review synthesizes findings from 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 to examine how older adults interact with health misinformation in digital contexts. The review identifies a complex interplay of factors contributing to their susceptibility, including cognitive decline, gaps in digital and health literacy, emotional and psychological influences, and the role of social relationships. However, most studies lack theoretical grounding, platform-specific analysis, and geographical diversity. Conceptual inconsistencies and a COVID-19 research bias further limit generalizability. The review calls for clearer definitions, interdisciplinary approaches, and targeted interventions to address this urgent public health issue and provide a foundation for designing more targeted and effective interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04714-z
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Older adults and online health misinformation: a systematic literature review

Guangyao Jin, Hongchao Hu, Xi Zhang
BMC Psychology
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Older adults and online health misinformation: a systematic literature review

Guangyao Jin, Hongchao Hu, Xi Zhang
article en

Abstract

As older adults increasingly rely on the internet for health-related information, concerns about their vulnerability to online health misinformation have intensified. This systematic literature review synthesizes findings from 26 empirical studies published between 2000 and 2024 to examine how older adults interact with health misinformation in digital contexts. The review identifies a complex interplay of factors contributing to their susceptibility, including cognitive decline, gaps in digital and health literacy, emotional and psychological influences, and the role of social relationships. However, most studies lack theoretical grounding, platform-specific analysis, and geographical diversity. Conceptual inconsistencies and a COVID-19 research bias further limit generalizability. The review calls for clearer definitions, interdisciplinary approaches, and targeted interventions to address this urgent public health issue and provide a foundation for designing more targeted and effective interventions.

BMC Psychology
North China Electric Power University (CN), Jinan University (CN), Peking University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, National Social Science Fund Youth Project
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.