Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia

Accurate BCR::ABL1 quantification is essential for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), particularly at the major molecular response (MMR; ≤0.1% IS) and deep molecular response (DMR) levels: MR4 (≤0.01% IS) and MR4.5 (≤0.0032% IS). We evaluated the analytical performance of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR Kit (1drop, Republic of Korea), a one-step real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) Kit and compared it with two established assays. Precision, linearity, and detection capability (LoB, LoD, LoQ] were assessed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. A method comparison study was performed using 74 clinical samples tested concurrently with the ipsogen BCR::ABL1 Mbcr IS-MMR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the QXDx BCR::ABL %IS droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Concordance was further evaluated at clinically critical molecular response thresholds (>10%, >1%, and ≤0.1% international scale [IS]). The coefficients of variation at 14.1% IS and 0.233% IS were 14.4% and 15.6%, respectively. The assay was linear across a 5-log range (0.02–85% IS; R 2 = 0.9949). The manufacturer-claimed LoB, LoD, and LoQ were verified. Pearson correlation coefficients with the ipsogen and QXDx assays were 0.951 and 0.950, respectively. Concordance at the >10% IS, >1% IS, and ≤0.1% IS thresholds was 98.6%, 100%, and 95.9% (vs. ipsogen), and 100%, 100%, and 90.5% (vs. QXDx), respectively. The 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical performance and high concordance with established quantitative assays at clinically relevant molecular response thresholds, supporting its utility for routine monitoring of CML. • The 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay showed reliable analytical performance. • Linearity was confirmed over a 5-log range with R 2 of 0.9949. • High concordance was observed with ipsogen RQ-PCR and QXDx ddPCR. • Concordance at MMR threshold was 93.2% and 90.5%, respectively. • One-step CataCleave approach reduces hands-on time in CML monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2026.e00538
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia

Hyerim Kim, Hyerin Kim, Do Young Kim
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
article

Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia

Hyerim Kim, Hyerin Kim, Do Young Kim
article en

Abstract

Accurate BCR::ABL1 quantification is essential for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), particularly at the major molecular response (MMR; ≤0.1% IS) and deep molecular response (DMR) levels: MR4 (≤0.01% IS) and MR4.5 (≤0.0032% IS). We evaluated the analytical performance of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR Kit (1drop, Republic of Korea), a one-step real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) Kit and compared it with two established assays. Precision, linearity, and detection capability (LoB, LoD, LoQ] were assessed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. A method comparison study was performed using 74 clinical samples tested concurrently with the ipsogen BCR::ABL1 Mbcr IS-MMR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the QXDx BCR::ABL %IS droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Concordance was further evaluated at clinically critical molecular response thresholds (>10%, >1%, and ≤0.1% international scale [IS]). The coefficients of variation at 14.1% IS and 0.233% IS were 14.4% and 15.6%, respectively. The assay was linear across a 5-log range (0.02–85% IS; R 2 = 0.9949). The manufacturer-claimed LoB, LoD, and LoQ were verified. Pearson correlation coefficients with the ipsogen and QXDx assays were 0.951 and 0.950, respectively. Concordance at the >10% IS, >1% IS, and ≤0.1% IS thresholds was 98.6%, 100%, and 95.9% (vs. ipsogen), and 100%, 100%, and 90.5% (vs. QXDx), respectively. The 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay demonstrated reliable analytical performance and high concordance with established quantitative assays at clinically relevant molecular response thresholds, supporting its utility for routine monitoring of CML. • The 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay showed reliable analytical performance. • Linearity was confirmed over a 5-log range with R 2 of 0.9949. • High concordance was observed with ipsogen RQ-PCR and QXDx ddPCR. • Concordance at MMR threshold was 93.2% and 90.5%, respectively. • One-step CataCleave approach reduces hands-on time in CML monitoring.

Practical Laboratory Medicine
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.