Heterogeneous Responses of High‐Latitude Forest Productivity to Interannual Climate Variability

Abstract Amplified warming has altered the phenology and structure of high‐latitude forests, yet their carbon uptake responses to environmental variations remain uncertain. Using satellite observations of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), we quantify interannual variations in growing‐season (GS) productivity of these forests and their climatic drivers. GS productivity is largely controlled by early‐ and peak‐season temperatures: warmer springs enhance carbon uptake and, despite moderate legacy declines later in the season, overall productivity increases in warmer years in most regions. Pronounced heterogeneity is observed among plant functional types—deciduous needleleaf forests (DNF) show weaker temperature sensitivity and stronger water dependence than other forests. In DNF, temperature effects weaken or reverse under dry conditions and persist after accounting for canopy structural effects, indicating strong water constraints on physiological responses. These results underscore the heterogeneous climate sensitivities of high‐latitude forests and highlight SIF as a powerful tool for monitoring their productivity and responses to climate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl121078
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous Responses of High‐Latitude Forest Productivity to Interannual Climate Variability

Christian Frankenberg, Paul Wennberg, Junjie Liu, Yitong Yao et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Heterogeneous Responses of High‐Latitude Forest Productivity to Interannual Climate Variability

Christian Frankenberg, Paul Wennberg, Junjie Liu, Yitong Yao, Ke Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Amplified warming has altered the phenology and structure of high‐latitude forests, yet their carbon uptake responses to environmental variations remain uncertain. Using satellite observations of solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), we quantify interannual variations in growing‐season (GS) productivity of these forests and their climatic drivers. GS productivity is largely controlled by early‐ and peak‐season temperatures: warmer springs enhance carbon uptake and, despite moderate legacy declines later in the season, overall productivity increases in warmer years in most regions. Pronounced heterogeneity is observed among plant functional types—deciduous needleleaf forests (DNF) show weaker temperature sensitivity and stronger water dependence than other forests. In DNF, temperature effects weaken or reverse under dry conditions and persist after accounting for canopy structural effects, indicating strong water constraints on physiological responses. These results underscore the heterogeneous climate sensitivities of high‐latitude forests and highlight SIF as a powerful tool for monitoring their productivity and responses to climate.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(9)
California Institute of Technology (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Columbia University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heterogeneous Responses of High‐Latitude Forest Productivity to Interannual Climate Variability — Christian Frankenberg, Paul Wennberg, et al. · Geophysical Research Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS